UNETHICAL HIRING PRACTICES UNCOVERED AT
FAYETTEVILLE VA --
DIRECTOR JANET STOUT AND THREE MANAGERS
TO BE DISCIPLINED

Story here...
http://www.fayettevillenc.com/article?id=228759
Story below:
---------------
Report reveals unethical hiring at VA Medical
Center
By John Fuquay
Staff writer
RALEIGH — Disciplinary action has been recommended for Fayetteville Veterans
Affairs Medical Center Director Janet Stout and three senior managers after
a federal investigation that substantiated unethical hiring practices.
In three cases, senior managers used questionable hiring procedures to hire
the spouses of other senior managers, according to the federal report. A
fourth case involved the hiring of a manager’s fiancee.
One of the spouses was hired despite a panel’s review that ranked the spouse
11th in a field of 21 applicants. Another spouse was found unable to perform
her duties after eight days on the job because she didn’t have suitable
experience.
The other managers involved in the hiring are associate directors Orlando
Dunson and Vera Hansen, and Clint Nordan, who was an acting associate
director during some of the hirings. Stout and each of the managers declined
interview requests Thursday.
Medical Center spokeswoman Norma Byrd said, “It would just be inappropriate
for them to comment at this time.’’ She said all four remain employed at the
hospital.
The four hirings happened between February 2003 and June 2004 and were
investigated by the Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Inspector
General. The report, “Administrative Investigation, Appearance of
Preferential Treatment,’’ was published in September.
In a separate investigation, a human resource officer asked for and received
a $20,930 annual raise within 90 days on the job. The report says a salary
reclassification after an employee has accepted an appointment is against
federal procedure.
No illegalities
The OIG investigation concluded that none of the hirings was illegal.
However, it said “the pattern of senior managers hiring other senior
managers’ spouses/fiancee under questionable circumstances gave the
appearance that preferential treatment was afforded to them in violation of
federal ethics regulations.’’
The report does not prove that Stout and the other managers actually gave
preferential treatment. However, it recommends action against them for
creating the appearance of giving preferential treatment. The findings are
based on sworn testimony from current and former employees and a review of
personnel records.
Judy Shelly, an OIG official in Washington familiar with the investigation,
said Wednesday that the VA director of the multistate district that includes
North Carolina concurred with unspecified administrative action against
Stout and the other managers. She said action could range from counseling to
termination, depending on the director’s record.
However, the district director conducted a separate investigation and
submitted recommendations to a VA undersecretary in Washington. Action on
those recommendations is pending. The undersecretary, William Feeley, could
not be reached for comment.
The OIG and the district director agreed to “target’’ dates to complete the
administrative actions against Stout and the other managers. The most recent
of those dates passed Oct. 3, but Shelly emphasized that those were target
dates.
“They may feel they need to do some further investigating to determine what
that action might be,’’ Shelly said. “The purpose is to determine what level
of action is appropriate.’’
Leadership concerns
Daniel Hoffman, the district director over VA facilities in North Carolina,
Virginia and parts of West Virginia and South Carolina, was unavailable. His
spokesman, Dave Raney, declined to discuss the recommendations because they
are pending. He said there were no new developments that caused the target
dates to be missed.
“Our director is very concerned about leadership at those facilities,’’
Raney said. “He’s very concerned about ethical leadership, and he wants to
be fair and above board.’’
The OIG report was provided to The Fayetteville Observer through a Freedom
of Information Act request; however, the names and job titles of the spouses
and fiancee were concealed. Because the OIG said naming the spouses and
fiancee would invade their privacy, it remains uncertain whether they are
the spouses or fiancee of Stout or any of the managers.
The report also does not identify the individual whose complaint prompted
the investigation.
One spouse was hired to a temporary position in the emergency management
service department. The report said the department head had no involvement
in the hiring and learned about it from Stout on the day the spouse reported
for work. The position was not advertised to determine whether federally
displaced employees were interested, which is a federal hiring requirement.
The manager who hired the spouse who ranked 11th among 21 applicants told
the OIG he felt pressured by Nordan to hire the spouse. The manager said he
initially did not know what duties to assign the spouse and rewrote the
position’s job description to give the spouse suitable duties.
Another spouse was hired to a part-time position by a human resources
officer following Dunson’s instructions, the report said. Dunson had
received the spouse’s resume from her husband. The position had been vacant
several months, and requests to fill the position had been ignored until the
spouse emerged as a candidate, the report said.
It also said Dunson is normally involved in hiring upper-level employees and
not part-time employees. Eight days after the spouse was hired, she was
considered unqualified. The report said she was given another job seven
months later but does not specify her role during the interim.
Hansen hired the fiancee over six applicants without interviewing the
fiancee. She interviewed all the other employees she hired from outside the
medical center, according to the report.
Reclassifications
In another investigation, the OIG determined Dunson and Stout erroneously
approved the salary and job reclassification of the medical center’s human
resource officer, whose name also was concealed in the report. In
recommendations for corrections, the officer was directed to repay the
excess salary.
The investigation was not related to December’s deadly shooting between two
employees who worked in the hospital’s pharmacy and had a decade-long
affair.
Arthur James Charland Jr., 42, faces a federal murder charge in the shooting
death of Linda Faye Owens. The trial is scheduled to begin in May. An OIG
official in Washington said the agency is investigating the shooting with
the FBI.
Staff writer John Fuquay can be reached at
fuquayj@fayettevillenc.com
or (919) 828-7641.
---------------
Larry Scott
(go
back to VA Watchdog dot Org Home Page)

Now we have VA Watchdog Stuff
Cups, Hats, Shirts and more
Click
here to order and support the site
Here's the link to subscribe to VA NEWS FLASH as an RSS feed

Comments on this VA NEWS FLASH?
Email Larry
key available on
request
|
|