| CONCURRENT RECEIPT OFFSET
RANKLES MANY VETS "I
don't want anyone stealing money out of my retirement pay. It's
unethical. It's unconscionable to do this. I want every cent due
to me."
NOTE from Larry Scott, VA
Watchdog dot Org ...
Although the following article
accurately depicts the anger and frustration of those veterans
still caught in the concurrent receipt offset nightmare, it isn't
up-to-date regarding the latest legislation. That is listed
below with links so you can read and track the latest bills.
H.R. 811: Retired Pay Restoration Act
Introduced Feb 3, 2009
H.R. 303: Retired Pay Restoration Act
Introduced Jan 8, 2009
S. 546: Retired Pay Restoration Act of 2009
Introduced Mar 9, 2009
-------------------------
Veteran wages battle for
benefits
BY BOB KALINOWSKI
STAFF WRITER
LARKSVILLE — U.S. Army veteran Thomas Paliscak served his country
for 21 years and suffers from the effects of Agent Orange exposure
during the Vietnam War.
Since retiring from the military, the Larksville man has waged
another battle at home for full retirement and disability
benefits.
The 79-year-old is fed up and is making a public plea.
Paliscak is among several hundred thousand American veterans with
a war-related disability who contest their retirement and
disability pay.
Under a Civil War-era provision, every dollar Paliscak’s
disability compensation increases, a dollar is taken from his
military retirement pay. That means disabled veterans likes
Paliscak who receive a military pension for their service receive
no extra compensation for service-related injuries.
The disability portion is tax-exempt, but the net difference still
is not even close to what disabled veterans are owed, Paliscak
said.
“I’m not being compensated for my disability. A hell of a lot of
us should be receiving a disability payment as a separate check,”
Paliscak said. “It’s like robbing Peter to pay Paul.”
After his military career, Paliscak worked as an English teacher
at West Side Vocational Technical School in Pringle until 1993,
when a doctor ordered him to “cease and desist” from working
because of his condition. The Agent Orange poisoning burns his
skin inside and out, mars his body with blotches, and causes
severe itching, among other problems, he said.
“My face will be so damn itchy at times, I’ll want to scratch my
face off,” he said.
Paliscak has been writing to politicians around the country for
years asking them to reverse what he calls a “scam” and a
“nauseating charade.”
“I don’t want anyone stealing money out of my retirement pay. It’s
unethical. It’s unconscionable to do this. I want every cent due
to me,” Paliscak said.
In
2000, U.S. Rep. Paul E. Kanjorski, D-Nanticoke, answered one of
Paliscak’s letters, calling the issue a “gross inequity” and has
continued the correspondence about the issue since then.
Current U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, has
called the problem “a disgrace” and “an injustice.” Reid in 2007
sponsored “The Retired Pay Restoration Act of 2007,” which he
called “important legislation to allow veterans eligible for both
disability compensation and retirement pay to collect both at the
same time — also known as ‘concurrent receipt.’”
The bill remains in committee.
Meanwhile, veterans like Paliscak are growing impatient.
U.S. Sen. Robert Casey, D-Scranton, said he is a co-sponsor of
Reid’s bill and is supporting its full passage.
“People who should be getting the full benefits of their service
are not receiving that. It’s not just a question of fundamental or
basic fairness, it’s about keeping a promise. We tell people if
you serve your country, we’ll take care of you. When we don’t meet
that promise, it undermines the credibility of our government,”
Casey said Friday.
Casey added: “Like a lot of significant and urgent priorities in
the Congress, consensus about an issue is one thing, but getting
legislation passed can sometimes take longer. One of the
impediments people in Washington will point to is fiscal
realities. I don’t buy that. When you consider the promise we made
and the sacrifice put forth by fighting men and women, and you
also put on the table the resources of our government, we could
get this done.”
As for when there would be some movement, Casey said he couldn’t
be sure.
“I can’t promise this is going to get done soon. If I did say
that, I’m not sure it would be true. I can promise we are going to
continue to work on it and continue to make it a priority. We even
have some Republican help on this, which isn’t always the case
around here,” Casey said.
------------------------
KEYWORDS:
veterans, veterans' benefits, VA, Department of Veterans' Affairs,
concurrent receipt |