| DID KBR KNOW
HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM WAS RISK TO GIs?
KBR denies any wrongdoing. Company
said it found the chemical, restricted access and cleaned it up.
NOTE from
Larry Scott, VA Watchdog dot Org
... Refer to our Iraq War
Toxins page for more about hexavalent chromium and the burn
pits.
-------------------------
Did KBR
know Iraq locale was polluted, putting soldiers at risk?
By SHARON COHEN
AP National Writer
Larry Roberta's every breath is a painful reminder of his time in
Iraq. He can't walk a block without gasping for air. His chest
hurts, his migraines sometimes persist for days and he needs pills
to help him sleep.
James Gentry came home with rashes, ear troubles and a shortness
of breath. Later, things got much worse: He developed lung cancer,
which spread to his spine, ribs and one of his thighs; he must
often use a cane, and no longer rides his beloved Harley.
David Moore's postwar life turned into a harrowing medical
mystery: nosebleeds and labored breathing that made it impossible
to work, much less speak. His desperate search for answers ended
last year when he died of lung disease at age 42.
What these three men - one sick, one dying, one dead - had in
common is they were National Guard soldiers on the same stretch of
wind-swept desert in Iraq during the early months of the war in
2003.
These soldiers and hundreds of other Guard members from Indiana,
Oregon and West Virginia were protecting workers hired by a
subsidiary of the giant contractor, KBR Inc., to rebuild an Iraqi
water treatment plant. The area, as it turned out, was
contaminated with hexavalent chromium, a potent, sometimes deadly
chemical linked to cancer and other devastating diseases.
No one disputes that. But that's where agreement ends.
Among the issues now rippling from the courthouse to Capitol Hill
are whether the chemical made people sick, when KBR knew it was
there and how the company responded. But the debate is more than
about this one case; it has raised broader questions about private
contractors and health risks in war zones.
Questions, says Sen. Evan Bayh, who plans to hold hearings on the
issues, such as these:
"How should we treat exposure to potentially hazardous chemicals
as a threat to our soldiers? How seriously should that threat be
taken? What is the role of private contractors? What about the
potential conflict between their profit motives and taking all
steps necessary to protect our soldiers?
"This case," says the Indiana Democrat, "has brought to light the
need for systemic reform."
For now, dozens of National Guard veterans have sued KBR and two
subsidiaries, accusing them of minimizing and concealing the
chemical's dangers, then downplaying nosebleeds and breathing
problems as nothing more than sand allergies or a reaction to
desert air.
KBR denies any wrongdoing. In a statement, the company said it
actually found the chemical at the Qarmat Ali plant, restricted
access, cleaned it up and "did not knowingly harm troops."
Ten civilians hired by a KBR subsidiary made similar claims in an
arbitration resolved privately in June. (The workers' contract
prevented them from filing suit.)
This isn't the first claim that toxins have harmed soldiers in
Iraq and Afghanistan; there have been allegations involving lead,
depleted uranium and sarin gas.
This also isn't the first challenge to KBR, whose billions of
dollars of war-related contracts have been the subject of
congressional scrutiny and numerous legal claims.
Among them are lawsuits recently filed against KBR and Halliburton
Co. - KBR's parent company until 2007 - that assert open-air pits
used to burn refuse in Iraq and Afghanistan caused respiratory
illnesses, tumors and death. (KBR says it is reviewing the
charges. Halliburton maintains it was improperly named and expects
to be dismissed from the case.)
Earlier this year, several members of Congress asked Veterans
Affairs Secretary Eric Shinseki to investigate potential burn pit
hazards. He replied that his agency is conducting a health study
of 30,000 Iraq and Afghanistan veterans and noted the VA "has
learned important lessons from previous military conflicts" as it
deals with environmental exposure questions.
Some veterans advocates say the military is more attuned to health
risks than it was in Vietnam and the Gulf War, but still falls
short.
"I'm a realist - things are going to get burned, things are going
to be blown up," says Tom Tarantino, an Iraqi veteran and policy
associate at the Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America. "But I
think the DOD (Department of
Defense)
could do a better job at tracking what people are exposed to. If
there's a big pit outside your base, you need to know what's going
on and do tests ... so if people start getting sick, they won't
spend years trying to figure out what's wrong with them."
This isn't a natural fit, he concedes, since the Defense
Department "is a war-fighting agency, not an environmental
protection agency. But I think there's a lack of information out
there."
This case stems from the chaotic start of the war in 2003 when a
KBR subsidiary was hired to restart the plant, which had been
looted of equipment, wiring, even metal roofing and siding. The
Iraqis had used hexavalent chromium to prevent pipe corrosion at
the plant, which produced industrial water used in oil production.
It's the same chemical linked to poisonings in California in a
case made famous in the movie "Erin Brockovich."
Hexavalent chromium - a toxic component of sodium dichromate - can
cause severe liver and kidney damage and studies have linked it to
leukemia as well as bone, stomach, brain and other cancers,
according to an expert who provided a deposition for the civilian
workers.
The chemical "is one of the most potent carcinogens know to man"
and it can "enter every cell of the body and potentially produce
widespread injury to every major organ in the body," said Max
Costa, chairman of New York University's Department of
Environmental Medicine.
KBR, however, says studies show only that industrial workers
exposed to the chemical for more than two years have an increased
risk of cancer - and in this case, soldiers were at the plant just
days or months.
The company also notes air quality studies concluded the Indiana
Guard soldiers were not exposed to high levels of hexavalent
chromium. But Costa says those tests were done when the wind was
not blowing.
Both soldiers and former workers say there were days when strong
gusts kicked up ripped-open bags of the chemical, creating a
yellow-orange haze that coated everything from their hair to their
boots.
"I was spitting blood and I was not the only one doing that,"
recalls Larry Langford, who worked for the KBR subsidiary. "The
wind was blowing 30, 40 miles an hour. You could just hardly see
where you were going. I pulled my shirt over my nose and there
would be blood on it. I also saw the soldiers. They had blood
splotches on their masks."
Larry Roberta, a 44-year-old former Oregon National Guard member,
remembers a strange metallic taste and dust everywhere. He sat on
a bag of the chemical, unaware it was dangerous.
"This orange crud blew up in your face, your eyes and on our
food," he says. "I tried to wash my chicken patty off with my
canteen. I started to get sick to my stomach right away."
Roberta had coughing spells and agonizing chest pains, he says,
that "went all the way through my back. Whenever I breathed, the
pain got more sharp. ... Every day I went there, I had something
weird going on."
Russell Kimberling, a former Indiana National Guard captain, had
severe sinus troubles that forced his evacuation to Germany. After
returning, he became alarmed one August day in 2003 while
escorting some officials to the plant in the southern Iraqi city
of Basra.
"I jumped out of the truck and I turned around and they (KBR
staff) had full chemical gear on," he says. "I looked at some of
my soldiers and said, 'This can't be very good."'
"They could have told us to put chemical suits on," Kimberling
adds. "There are so many things that could have been done."
Ed Blacke, hired as plant health, safety and environmental
coordinator, says he became worried after workers started having
breathing problems and a former colleague sent him an internal KBR
memo outlining the chemical's dangers. Blacke says when he
complained at a meeting, he was labeled a troublemaker and
resigned under pressure.
"Normally when you take over a job, you have a briefing - this is
what's out there, here's what you need for protective equipment,"
says Blacke, who testified at a Senate Democratic Policy Committee
hearing last year. "There was nothing, nothing at all."
Blacke and Langford were among those whose civil claims were
resolved in arbitration.
Kimberling is among nearly 50 current or former Guard members -
most from Indiana, a smaller number from Oregon - who've sued.
Some soldiers who were part of the West Virginia Guard are
expected to follow soon.
Mike Doyle, the Houston lawyer representing the soldiers and
civilians, maintains KBR knew as early as May 2003 the chemical
was there, but didn't close the site until that September.
"Once they (KBR) found out about it, they didn't tell anybody and
they did everything to conceal it," he contends. "You have (KBR)
managers in Houston, in Kuwait City who knew about this. Their
staff was getting reports and soldiers and civilians who were in
the field were told, 'No big deal. There's nothing to worry
about."'
The lawsuit cites minutes of an August 2003 KBR meeting that
mentions "serious health problems at the water treatment plant"
and notes "almost 60 percent of the people now exhibit the
symptoms."
In a recent interview with The Associated Press, KBR chairman
William P. Utt discussed numerous issues and suggested the company
be given some latitude with its military contracts.
"We think there ought to be some consideration given in many of
these claims to the same protections the government has from these
suits that exist," he said.
He also said KBR has been unfairly targeted in war zones. "People
think there's an opportunity here in Iraq, let's paint it on KBR,
then we'll worry about making the facts precise or correct later,"
Utt said.
As for the water plant, KBR says once it learned of the chemical,
it took precautions to protect workers, notified the Army Corps of
Engineers and led the cleanup. It says the Corps had previously
deemed the area safe.
KBR also points to Army tests of 137 Indiana Guard soldiers that
showed no medical problems that could be linked to exposure, as
well as a military board review that found it unlikely anyone
would suffer long-term medical consequences.
But Bayh and Doyle say those tests were done too late to be valid
and note that soil tests were taken after the contaminated area
was covered with asphalt and gravel.
Doyle also disagrees with KBR's contention that workers weren't
there long enough - weeks or months - to have elevated cancer
risks.
It can take a long time for symptoms of illness to surface - five
to 10 years or more for cancer. But some of those who say they
were exposed are already ill.
Gentry, a retired lieutenant colonel who commanded the Indiana
Guard unit, is in the late stages of lung cancer, which has spread
to other parts of his body, according to his friend, Christopher
Lee.
Gentry hasn't sued, but in a December 2008 deposition he recalled
complaining to his superiors after his soldiers were told by KBR
workers the orangish sand was a cancer-causing chemical. He said
it was "very disappointing" that KBR managers didn't share that
information.
"I'm dying because of it," he said.
While acknowledging he wasn't 100 percent certain that's why he
has cancer, Gentry - who served a second tour in Iraq - said his
doctor "believes the most probable cause was my exposure to this
chemical."
KBR's actions, he said, had put "my men at risk that is
unnecessary."
The Indiana, West Virginia and Oregon National Guards have sent
hundreds of letters to soldiers notifying them of possible
contamination and urging them to seek medical attention. The
Oregon Guard also set up a Facebook page and reports about 15
soldiers have reported medical symptoms.
Bayh has introduced a bill calling for a special medical registry
that would require the Department of Defense to notify all
military members of exposure to potential toxins - and provide
comprehensive medical care. (It would be limited to those serving
after Sept. 11, 2001.)
All these measures come too late for 1st Sgt. David Moore, who
served with Gentry.
He thought his persistent cough in Iraq would stop when he
returned home. Instead, breathing became difficult; he eventually
needed a chair in the shower because he could no longer stand,
says his brother, Steve.
Moore had nosebleeds, too, and boil-like rashes behind his ears
and on his back, arms and legs. He went from doctor to doctor.
"None of them could ever figure out what it was," his brother
says.
By late 2007, the one-time construction worker - who had been
"strong as an ox," and ran 3½ miles every other day - couldn't
even venture outside, Steve Moore says. But he didn't give up.
"He was always upbeat," his brother says. "He said, 'They'll
figure it out, they'll figure it out.' He thought that until the
last time I talked to him. You could see the fear in his eyes.
They had him on 100 percent oxygen and he still couldn't breathe.
He requested to be put on a ventilator so they could figure it
out."
Moore died in February 2008. The cause was lung disease. His death
was ruled service-related. His brother believes it was hexavalent
chromium.
Larry Roberta, the former Oregon Guardsman who needed stomach
surgery after his return, still has physical and emotional
problems: Post traumatic stress. Mood swings. Nose polyps. Chest
pains. Migraines that can keep him bedridden for days.
He takes two inhalers - he can't walk a block without them - and
high blood pressure medicine every day and testosterone shots
every two weeks.
"I have 100 percent disability," he says. "I've got a long laundry
list of things that happened to me while I was there. If you add
it all up, I'd be almost 200 percent disabled."
Roberta recently testified before Oregon lawmakers, urging them to
set aside money for Guard members who develop cancer from exposure
to the chemical.
His wife, Michelle, says her husband's illness has dramatically
changed his outlook.
"He has no ambitions for life anymore," she says. "At his age,
that makes me very sad. I worry about him every day."
Kimberling, the former Indiana Guardsman, struggles as well.
The father of two young children - he's a pharmaceutical salesman
in Louisville, Ky. - says he hasn't been able to get life
insurance because his possible exposure is mentioned on his
medical records.
Sometimes, he says, it's hard to sort out his real aches from his
fears.
"I feel like I'm a 38-year-old in a 60-year-old's body," he says.
"There are a lot of things that seem to be going south a lot
quicker than they should. Sinus problems ... pain in my joints
that I've never felt before.
"I'm not sure if it's the anxiety of finding out about it or not.
I kind of know and feel it's just a matter of time before it
catches up with me."
Kimberly Hefling in Washington, D.C., contributed to this report.
-------------------------
TOPICS:
veterans, veterans' benefits, VA, Department of Veterans' Affairs,
KBR, hexavalent chromium |