| WILL NSA
CYBERSECURITY PUT AN END TO GOV WHISTLEBLOWERS?
Homeland Security officials say the
NSA program, Einstein 3, will scrutinize data going to or from
government systems.
NOTE from Larry Scott, VA
Watchdog dot Org ... One of the unintended consequences (or,
maybe, it actually is THE intended consequence) of this NSA
cybersecurity program is that government employees will be
"discouraged" from sharing information that they have on their
agency computer systems.
While most government
whistleblowers are smart enough not to use their agency computers
to communicate with reporters or other investigators, they must
use them to transfer files such as documents or email threads.
Many VA employees who provide
information to VA Watchdog dot Org send the files to their private
email address and then forward them to us. But, this NSA
program could put an end to that as it monitors the flow of
information leaving or coming into government agencies.
Although the government is sure
to assure us that this is not domestic spying, is most certainly
is and will surely put the fear of Big Brother into any government
employee who is thinking about blowing the whistle.
-------------------------
Cybersecurity Plan to Involve NSA, Telecoms
DHS Officials Debating The
Privacy Implications
By Ellen Nakashima
Washington Post Staff Writer
The Obama administration will proceed with a Bush-era plan to use
National Security Agency assistance in screening government
computer traffic on private-sector networks, with AT&T as the
likely test site, according to three current and former government
officials.
President Obama said in May that government efforts to protect
computer systems from attack would not involve "monitoring
private-sector networks or Internet traffic," and Department of
Homeland Security officials say the new program will scrutinize
only data going to or from government systems.
But the program has provoked debate within DHS, the officials
said, because of uncertainty about whether private data can be
shielded from unauthorized scrutiny, how much of a role NSA should
play and whether the agency's involvement in warrantless
wiretapping during George W. Bush's presidency would draw
controversy. Each time a private citizen visited a "dot-gov" Web
site or sent an e-mail to a civilian government employee, that
action would be screened for potential harm to the network.
"We absolutely intend to use the technical resources, the
substantial ones, that NSA has. But . . . they will be guided, led
and in a sense directed by the people we have at the Department of
Homeland Security," the department's secretary, Janet Napolitano,
told reporters in a discussion about cybersecurity efforts.
Under a classified pilot program approved during the Bush
administration, NSA data and hardware would be used to protect the
networks of some civilian government agencies. Part of an
initiative known as Einstein 3, the plan called for
telecommunications companies to route the Internet traffic of
civilian agencies through a monitoring box that would search for
and block computer codes designed to penetrate or otherwise
compromise networks.
AT&T, the world's largest telecommunications firm, was the Bush
administration's choice to participate in the test, which has been
delayed for months as the Obama administration determines what
elements to preserve, former government officials said. The pilot
program was to have begun in February.
"To be clear, Einstein 3 development is proceeding," DHS
spokeswoman Amy Kudwa said. "We are moving forward in a way that
protects privacy and civil liberties."
AT&T officials declined to comment.
A DHS official said the delay occurred because the original
timeline "did not take into account all that was required to
ensure the exercise would provide the data needed."
The program is the most controversial element of the $17 billion
cybersecurity initiative the Bush administration started in
January 2008. Einstein 3 is crucial, advocates say, in an era in
which hackers have compromised computer systems at the Commerce
and State departments and have taken military jet data from a
defense contractor.
The
NSA declined to comment on Einstein 3, but a spokeswoman said the
agency would help DHS in "any way possible, including technical
support," as it seeks to protect government networks.
The internal controversy reflects the central tension in the
debate over how best to defend the nation's mostly private system
of computer networks. The techniques that work best, experts say,
require the automated scrutiny of e-mail and other electronic
communications content -- something that commercial providers
already do.
Proponents of involving the government said such efforts should
harness the NSA's resources, especially its database of computer
codes, or signatures, that have been linked to cyberattacks or
known adversaries. The NSA has compiled the cache by, for example,
electronically observing hackers trying to gain access to U.S.
military systems, the officials said.
"That's the secret sauce," one official said. "It's the stuff they
have that the private sector doesn't."
But it is also the prospect of NSA involvement in cybersecurity
that fuels concerns about unwarranted government snooping into
private communication.
"The bitter battles over privacy and NSA's role in domestic
wiretapping hang over cybersecurity like a toxic cloud," said
Stewart A. Baker, who was assistant secretary of homeland security
under Bush.
AT&T was sued over its role in aiding the Bush-era
counterterrorism program to intercept Americans' e-mails and phone
calls without a warrant. It is seeking legal assurance that it
will not be sued for participating in the pilot program. That
legal certification has been held up for several months as DHS
prepares a contract, several current and former officials said.
Einstein's promise, they said, is that it can more effectively
detect malicious activity and disable intrusions before harm is
done to civilian government networks.
"Intrusion detection is like a cop with a radar gun on a highway
who catches you speeding or drunk and phones ahead to somebody at
the other end," Michael Chertoff, former homeland security
secretary, said in a recent interview. "Einstein 3 is a cop who
actually arrests you and pulls you off the road when he sees you
driving drunk."
The pilot program has two goals. The first is to prove that the
telecommunications firm can route only traffic destined for
federal civilian agencies through the monitoring system. The
second is to test whether the technology can work effectively on
civilian government networks. The sensor box would scan e-mail
messages and other content just before they enter the civilian
agency networks.
The classified NSA system, known as Tutelage, has the ability to
decide how to handle malicious intrusions -- to block them or
watch them closely to better assess the threat, sources said. It
is currently used to defend military networks.
The database for the program would also contain feeds from
commercial firms and DHS's U.S. Computer Emergency Readiness Team,
administration officials said.
"We're looking for malicious content, not a love note to someone
with a dot-gov e-mail address," a senior Bush administration
official said. "What we're interested in is finding the code, the
thing that will do the network harm, not reading the e-mail
itself."
Ari Schwartz, a vice president of the Center for Democracy and
Technology, was among a group of privacy advocates given a
classified briefing in March on the Einstein program. The
advocates wanted to ensure that officials had a plan to protect
privacy and civil liberties, including shielding such personally
identifying data as Internet protocol addresses.
"We came away saying they have a lot of work in front of them to
get this done right," Schwartz said. "We're looking forward to
their next steps."
Bush administration lawyers determined last year that DHS had the
legal authority to conduct the Einstein program, and could do so
in compliance with existing wiretap and privacy laws, as long as
appropriate policies were in place.
Last fall, plans for the pilot were proceeding, former officials
said. But in the Bush administration's final weeks, AT&T lawyers
raised concerns about legal liability, they said. Then-Attorney
General Michael B. Mukasey was willing to give AT&T written
assurance that it would bear no liability for participating in the
program, but both AT&T and the Justice Department agreed that the
new administration should issue the certification, they said.
"They just wanted to make sure the certification would not be
reversed by the next administration," a Bush administration
official said.
In hindsight, Baker said, the Bush White House's decision to
classify so much of its initiative was a mistake.
"It meant that the problem was not well understood," said Baker,
who was NSA general counsel in the Clinton administration. "The
solution was veiled in secrecy in a way that allowed people
outside to be suspicious, so anybody who mistrusted the
intelligence community could just assume that it was because they
were doing something that they shouldn't be doing."
Staff writers Spencer S. Hsu and Carrie Johnson contributed to
this report.
-------------------------
TOPICS:
veterans, veterans' benefits, VA, Department of Veterans' Affairs,
Homeland Security, NSA, cybersecurity, eavesdropping, Einstein 3
|