The American Veteran's On-Line News Magazine
                                                   Click here to make VA Watchdog dot Org your homepage

                      VA NEWS FLASH
from Larry Scott at VA Watchdog dot Org -- 02-23-2009
 



 


  click above for details



       click for details

 
 

 


 



VA Watchdog Stuff...
cups, hats, shirts...
click on item to order
and support the site.






Be sure to get all four
VA Watchdog dot Org
RSS feeds --
Daily VA
News Flashes
House CVA
Veterans' News

Senate CVA
Veterans' News

VA Press
Releases
 

 


Download your

free copy of the

2008 VA benefits

handbook here...

 

 

Printer-Friendly Version





VA WHISTLEBLOWER PAYS HIGH PRICE, AND VETERANS LOSE

AS WELL -- The firing of Dr. Robert Van Boven sends a

chilling message to VA employees and may put an

end to valuable traumatic brain injury research.

 

 


Dr. Robert Van Boven

 

Story below: 

Your comments accepted at bottom of page.


Share story/email link.
-------------------------

by Larry Scott

 

In July of 2007, Dr. Robert Van Boven took over as head of the VA's  traumatic brain injury (TBI) research at the University of Texas in Austin.  Story here... http://www.vawatchdog.org/07/nf07/nfDEC07/nf122907-2.htm

Shortly after that, he filed a complaint with the VA's Office of Inspector General (VAOIG) charging waste, fraud and cronyism in that research program.  That story here...
http://www.vawatchdog.org/08/nf08/nfFEB08/nf021208-3.htm

VAOIG investigated... and agreed with some of Van Boven's complaints, but not all... details here...
http://www.vawatchdog.org/08/nf08/nfAUG08/nf080508-3.htm

Van Boven challenged VAOIG's findings... story here...
http://www.vawatchdog.org/08/nf08/nfAUG08/nf082008-6.htm

And, guess what?  The VA fired Van Boven.  That story here...
http://www.vawatchdog.org/08/nf08/nfnov08/nf110108-3.htm

The appearance that the two are connected is not coincidental.

Then, the VA decided they might close the TBI research lab... even as the VA was describing TBI as the "signature wound" of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.  Details on that are here...
http://www.vawatchdog.org/08/nf08/nfdec08/nf121308-5.htm

But, Van Boven was not done with the matter.  The local outcry was loud and clear:  Keep the lab open.  Politicians began taking notice and sided with Van Boven's position to save the research center... More on that here...
http://www.vawatchdog.org/08/nf08/nfdec08/nf121908-6.htm
http://www.vawatchdog.org/08/nf08/nfdec08/nf122708-6.htm

So, where does all of this leave us?

Van Boven is out at the VA.  He has had to take a position working in another state... away from his family. 

VA did an "internal" investigation of the Austin program.  It is basically a white-wash.

At this time the U.S. Office of Special Counsel is conducting an investigation... looking at reprisals against whistleblowers.

Members of the House Vets' Committee's Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigation are looking into the matter.

And, Van Boven sits and waits for the wheels of the many bureaucracies to move a little faster.

Van Boven isn't vindictive.  He just wants the VA to keep the lab open and he wants his job back.

And, he doesn't wallow in self-pity.  He knew the risks when he turned VA whistleblower.

In a recent email to me Van Boven stated that his personal fall-out from this experience:

"...pales in significance to the more than 4,000 soldiers killed, and more than 320,000 injured, in service to our country in Iraq and Afghanistan...But a much larger issue is at stake that your readers should not only be aware of but should speak out about. Waste, misconduct and cronyism in the VA plays no small role in the $100 billion spent without commensurate services for our veterans. No substantial mechanism is in place to protect federal government whistle-blowers from reprisals when witnessing the shenanigans. With only 1% of complainants obtaining relief (20/2000 in FY2007) from the U.S. Office of Special Counsel from retaliations for speaking out, the watch-word to the whistle-blower is 'blow the whistle not.'"

What about the future of the TBI research?  Van Boven said:

"The VA will close the BIRL [TBI research] to bury the story (damage control). The VA needs external oversight for accountability. Concerns I raised were independently confirmed by 5 outside experts from the leading institutions in America. Yet the VA persisted in a cover up motivated out of self-interest and self-preservation. I was an outsider rocking the boat."

President Obama promised more protection for government whistleblowers, even encouraging them to come forward.  But, language that would toughen whistleblower protections was stripped out of the Stimulus Package (Democrats and Republicans could not agree on exact wording).

This story sends a chilling message to government employees who see wrong-doing:  If you want to survive, just shut up!

And, in this particular case, it sends an awful message to the nation's veterans.  It tells us VA is willing to shut down a TBI research center just to protect itself.

---------------

Van Boven's latest commentary was published here...
http://www.statesman.com/opinion/conten
t/editorial/stories/02/21/0221vanboven_edit.html

Posted below:

---------------

COMMENTARY

Van Boven: Time to bring accountability to VA

Robert Van Boven
LOCAL CONTRIBUTOR



At a time when fiscal responsibility and accountability in government are so crucial, the $100 billion annual budget of Veterans Affairs, the second-largest department in government, should be front and center for transparent analysis.

The VA's Office of Research Oversight conducted and recently released another internal self-regulatory investigation in January, after nearly a year of repeated requests, filled with serious noncompliance issues at Central Texas Veterans Health Care System. Not surprisingly, self-disclosure and self-criticism by the VA was remarkably cleansed and spun to appear benign. But with the estimated 150,000 to 300,000 survivors of brain injury from the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, and 1.5 million civilian victims annually in the balance, a call for higher performance and accountability from our public servants and employees in government is paramount.

The Associate Chief of Staff suppressed disclosures of research improprieties from review by the committees responsible for research integrity and compliance. He admitted requesting that disclosures be recalled and erased. His excuse? He wondered whether the serious allegations were in good faith. These verbal and written disclosures included fraud, plagiarism, funding of an unqualified person and invalid human research (corroborated by five outside experts from Harvard, Johns Hopkins and other leading universities).

Further, adequate review of protocol for scientific merit did not occur for this and other research. The report confirmed that the chief of staff was overseeing research in violation of committee rules and regulations. In all, this report found more than 27 violations or instances of noncompliance in the research program at the Central Texas system.

A related VA Inspector General report also substantiated that managers failed to act on disclosures of inappropriate financial expenditures. More than $2 million dollars were spent over two years without any product or research on a single veteran. One project, found to be scientifically invalid and led by an untrained investigator, spent more than $200,000 in research resources without a budget or recording data. The VA's Inspector General report also determined that this and other research had paid over $120,000 to a contractor accused of fraud, whose behavior escaped further scrutiny because he was working without a valid contract. But the VA did not call for remedies for senior management misconduct in suppressing and failing to act upon the above disclosures for investigation.

This poster-child of waste and mismanagement of public funding and precious resources intended to help our wounded warriors here in Texas lies hidden in public view, and the bureaucracy membership unfettered. The public deserves better.

Unfortunately, the VA solution was to form a committee in November, out of public view, to study the closure of the only dedicated traumatic brain injury research program in Texas, the Brain Imaging and Recovery Laboratory. Upon discovery, the Vietnam Veterans of America, Veterans for Common Sense, Sen. John Cornyn, and U.S. Reps. Lamar Smith, Michael McCaul, Lloyd Doggett and John Carter all protested to this closure. The VA solution? It will be conducting yet another internal study this week to further consider shutting down the program based at the University of Texas.

Ironically, not a single VA manager has been held accountable for the suppression, inaction, waste and mismanagement of the research program. Throwing the baby out and keeping the dirty bath water will bury the great promise and hope for wounded heroes and their families in Texas.

Reform in the VA, a promise unfulfilled.



Dr. Van Boven is a neurologist and neuroscientist whose special interests are in brain imaging and recovery.

-------------------------
posted by Larry Scott
Founder and Editor
VA Watchdog dot Org

-------------------------

-------------------------
Please post your comments below on Google Friend Connect.  You must sign in.  For larger view and work area, click blue "expand" button in upper right corner of comment box.

-------------------------

Don't forget to read all of today's VA News Flashes (click here)
Click here to make VA Watchdog dot Org your homepage
(go back to VA Watchdog dot Org Home Page)




 
     

Military Medical Malpractice 
Legal Network
               

 

 



VA Watchdog Stuff...
cups, hats, shirts...
click on item to order
and support the site.


 

 

   
Google
 
Web www.vawatchdog.org


FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such materials available in an effort to advance understanding of veterans' issues. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed an interest in receiving the included information for educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml   If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.