|


click above for details


VA Watchdog Stuff...
cups, hats, shirts...
click on item to order
and support the site.

Be sure to get all four
VA Watchdog dot Org
RSS feeds --
Daily VA
News Flashes
House CVA
Veterans' News
Senate CVA
Veterans' News
VA Press
Releases

Download your
free copy of the
2008 VA benefits
handbook here...

|
Printer-Friendly Version
JIM STRICKLAND'S MAIL BAG: VOLUME #6 FOR
2009 --
Veterans' Advocate Jim Strickland answers
questions
from VA Watchdog dot Org readers.

Jim Strickland -- Veterans' Advocate
Veterans' Advocate Jim Strickland provides
regular columns for VA Watchdog dot Org.
If you would like to contact Jim about his
columns, you can email him here...
The archive of Jim's articles
is here...
To find an answer to a specific VA benefits
question, use the VA Watchdog search engine...
click here...
And, be sure to use Jim's: A Military
Veterans Guide To Disability Compensation and Pension Benefits -- A
Compendium of Resources and Knowledge For The Disabled Veteran --
click here...
Your comments accepted at bottom of
page.
Share story/email link.
-------------------------
by Jim Strickland
NOTE: Letters in my mailbag are reprinted
just as they come to me. Spelling and grammar are left as is and only
small corrections are made to improve readability, ensure anonymity or
delete expletives that may offend some readers. This is not legal advice.
You should always seek the advice of an attorney who is qualified in
Veterans' law before you make any decisions about your own benefits.
-------------------------
Jim;
I wrote to you before about agent orange and how my ship was in DA NANG
harbor. It is a official from the C/P bulletin.Da Nang,Cam Ranh Bay,and
Vung Tau,to be part of the offshore blue water of Vietnam and not I repeat
not part of its inland waterway system. Go to bluewaternavy.org . and read
the lasts notice. We our, as a group dead in the water. (We) knew
something was coming and we where right. Now what Jim,I feel that our
government has left I big hole in my soul and heart. For thousand of us
blue water navy people that went there. If it wasn't agent orange that
caused all of our problems and is killing us slowly but surely what is?
Reply;
If you're asking me, "If it wasn't agent orange that caused all of our
problems and is killing us slowly but surely what is?", I can't answer
that question.
I can tell you that the courts have determined that dioxin isn't the cause
of any Blue Water Navy deaths.
Their logic isn't terribly unsound. Let's take a moment to look at the
science they've used. You may not like this but if you'll bear with me a
moment, you'll see another perspective.
The studies over the years have clearly demonstrated that exposure to some
herbicides (dioxin) may increase the chances of an individual contracting
certain diseases.
In the case of the RVN veteran, the focus is the conditions listed on the
"presumptive list". These are some cancers, DMII and some skin conditions.
We here a great deal of chatter today about prostate cancer, DMII and lung
cancer.
The controversy arises from the fact that as we age, we get these
conditions anyhow. The quick answer to your question may be, "Aging". In
the case of lung cancer, the question has to come up; "Was it the exposure
to AO or the 2 pack a day habit that caused the cancer?"
To answer any of the questions surrounding the mystery of AO exposure, we
can only rely on science. Our culture has been successful in using
scientific analysis for hunreds of years to determine the right or wrong
of certain issues.
In this case, studies are conducted of men (and women but to a lesser
extent) who served in Vietnam and those who didn't. If the rates of a
particular disease manifesting itself over the years are exactly the same
between the RVN vet and those who didn't serve in the RVN, it's impossible
to say that the conditions acquired are caused by exposure to herbicide.
The same sort of studies may indicate a cause and effect. For example, the
incidence of prostate cancer is statistically higher in the RVN veteran
than his civilian counterpart. Thus, prostate cancer has been determined
to be likely influenced by exposure and benefits are more or less
automatic. This is also true of non-Hodgkins lymphoma. Statistically there
are a significantly greater numbe of RVN vets with n-Hl than their peer
group.
To my knowledge, the same has not been true of the Blue Water veteran. The
Blue Water veteran is getting sick with diseases of the aging process at
about the same rate as those with no military experience.
The courts have reached the conclusion that there is no reliable cause and
effect relationship demonstrated.
The arguments for and against will never leave us. Were the studies fair
and unbiased? Was there as much information in the studies of Blue Water
as there were in studies like Ranch Hand? Is there a secret government
conspiracy to repress relevant information about Blue Water veterans so
that a few bucks can be shaved from the federal budget?
I don't have the answers.
What I do know is this: At some point very insurer will draw a line as to
the extent of their liability. If they don't, the tsunami of claimants
will never end and the insurer will have no budget left to accomplish any
other programs.
Consider the case of an insurer who covers claimants of a city bus
accident. The bus had 30 riders on it when it was struck by 2 vehicles.
Some occupants were seriously injured and hospitalized. There's little
question the insurer pays their medical expenses. Other occupants were
less seriously injured and the amount of liability by the insurer may be
debated. Some occupants weren't injured at all and any claim they make
will be turned away. The drivers and occupants of the cars are another
matter. Was the accident their fault? A lot will go into determining if
their is any obligation to them at all.
Finally, there's the phenomena of those who weren't there making claims.
This is real and distorts many such issues. The bus had 30 riders and
there are suddenly 33 claimants. The fact is that 3 people saw the
accident and then climbed aboard the bus, holding their neck in pain and
hoping for a piece of the action. That hurts the claims process for all
the legitimate riders.
The insurer of that bus draws a line in the sand...if a claimant can't
prove he was on the bus and if he can't prove his injuries were caused by
the accident, he won't take part in any settlement award. The insurer
can't extend it to anyone who makes a claim and still be a viable business
in the future.
In this case, the VA acts as the insurer. Through the process of
scientific study it's been determined that Blue Water veterans aren't
experiencing rates of diseases any different than the population at large.
They believe that if you are a Blue Water veteran with a lung cancer, it's
likely because you abuse tobacco, not because you may have been exposed to
AO.
The insurer, your DVA, has drawn a line in the sand. To get across that
line you must now take a different route. That route is direct cause.
As I've explained before, you must show that you were exposed to a
carcinogen. Then you must provide a diagnosis of a condition. Then you
must provide a clinical connection, a nexus, that your exposure to the
carcinogen is more likely than not the cause of your claimed condition.
If you are a smoker with lung cancer, you have a steep hill to climb to
show that your condition was probably due to AO exposure and not the
tobacco. If you're a 65 year old sedentary male who is clinically obese at
some 60 pounds over your desired weight and a high BMI, you aren't likely
to find many who will agree that your DMII is the result of AO exposure 40
years ago. If you have prostate cancer and you're in a group of senior
citizens who are getting prostate cancer at about the same rate as all
others, you may have a difficult time showing that it's caused by an
exposure to herbicide rather than fate.
Before you write to me to tell me how bad I am for not standing up for the
Blue Water veterans, remember this; I don't make the rules. All I do is to
deal with reality. The reality is that once the Supremes have heard your
plea and said "No, thanks." you don't have much left to do.
This is the system we use in America and it really stinks when you lose.
Our system of law and justice is the worst there is except for all the
others.
Your choice is to lick your wounds and whine or move ahead and attack on a
new front. The direct cause approach is waiting for you.
-------------------------
Jim;
As you know I have been trying to get medical care overseas for disabled
veterans.
(We first communicated 08/2008 about the need for a better coordinated
service for disabled American veterans who live away from the homeland.
You sent letters to sent to Senator Inouye and Senator Akaka concerning
the needs of American Veterans and their families living in SE Asia.)
This letter is to let you know that a big step forward has been
accomplished.
Here is a segment from a VA letter I received:
Jan 9, 2008
Subject: Rewording the FMP (Foreign Medical Program) to establish
all-inclusive medical care and other benefits for 100% disabled veterans
living overseas.
A legislative proposal to amend 38 U.S.C. 1724 has been drafted to
provide all-inclusive medical services to FMP veterans who have been
adjudicated by VA as 100% disabled. This proposal will be submitted for
inclusion consideration on the VA’s 2009 Legislative Agenda.
Mary Beth Saldin
Director
Health Administration Center
Denver, Co
If something like this could be passed it would
make such a change for veterans living all over the world. Veterans would
have a choice in how and where they will live out the rest of their lives.
Damn! I’m still in shock. Guess an old man with a computer and lots of
time on his hands can make a difference.
The VA asked that Douglas Katason, Lead Congressional Liaison
douglas.katason@va.gov
be our contact for this. I have e-mailed him to find out exactly what this
means to us and get copy of proposed amendment.
Thing is Jim I don’t know what to do next. If this is up the senate what
do we need to do now to drum up support? I know you have been down this
road before and would appreciate any advice or support you can offer. This
could be a big deal to lots of Veterans. We could sure use your help; we
are half way around world and all alone.
Here is article from Thailand newspaper about a veteran with 2 bullets in
his head and VA giving him grief. This helped push VA to make a move.
http://www.pattayadailynews.com/
shownews.php?IDNEWS=0000003462
Reply;
Your efforts prove that one "old man" who has his mind focused on a goal
can make a huge difference. Bitching and whining about the VA accomplishes
nothing. Your approach to achieve changes in legislation may accomplish a
redesign in how services are delivered for all veterans living away from
the soil of the United States.
My only suggestion is to keep it up. You can encourage others to help you
by communicating effectively and letting them know what you need them to
do. Along those lines you've given me permission to publish your email
address so that veterans living anywhere may communicate with you.
Phillip Williams
phil williams < philw4@hotmail.com
>
Director
SE Asia Veterans Support Project
As a sort of aside to all this, I cringe when I read foreign publications
that describe our American VA. It's remarkable that the rest of the world
seems to know that the American veteran is treated this way by his
government.
In the article you sent were comments like, "Yet another woeful case of
neglect by the U.S. Authorities is highlighted by the plight of courageous
Vietnam Vet, Richard Weinberg..." and "He says the government was keen
enough to send them off to be killed in their thousands (over 56,000 US
troops were killed in action and untold thousands suffered innumerable
incapacitating injuries and severe Post Traumatic Stress Disorder), but
when it comes to adequately looking after the injured survivors, the US
authorities apparently couldn’t care less. He further maintains a similar
accusation has been leveled at the US as regards their policy towards
injured veterans in their current conflict in Iraq."
It's horrifying to know that other nations are aware of our plight when we
read their headlines, "GALLANT VIETNAM VETERAN ABANDONED TO HIS FATE BY
CALLOUS U.S. AUTHORITIES".
More horrifying; They see and publish the truth our own popular press
ignores.
-------------------------
Jim;
Remember last September I emailied you a few times regarding TBI and
unemployability. We discussed the fact that the VBA told me my c-file is
lost/missing because it was sent to the wrong VAMC for my C&P exam causing
a delay in my claim. I filed this claim in December 2007. In any case I
took your advice and in early October I certified mailed the WACO VARO
asking for a complete and full copy of my c-file even though they have
been telling me for months it has been lost. Saturday December 20, 2008 I
recieved a copy of my c-file?
Last September I had applied for an increase for TBI and then later for IU
with your advise. I also applied for SSD in September 2008. Last December,
2008 the SSA awarded me SSD, back dated to October 2007. However, I am
still waiting on the Waco VARO to decide my IU claim. I am confused as to
why the SSA took only 3 months and the VA is still doing whatever for the
past 10 months. I have sent them (VA) everything they have asked for(Which
they already had) and my new SSD award information. The VA said they lost
my c-file which was causing a delay back in May through September 2008.
Yet when I sent a certified letter asking for a full and complete copy of
my c-file with your advise, I received my file in about 30 days from the
date of the mailed request. Can you give me advice on what to do or should
I just sit tight and keep my fingers crossed? I just don't get it
sometimes and I become frustrated and upset with the whole VA issue and
confusion. Do you think the VA will approve my IU claim?Thanks for your
advice
Reply;
This is just business as usual at your not-so-friendly VARO. Incompetence
abounds, attitudes stink and there are few there who care about you one
bit. Those who do care are overwhelmed by those who really don't like
veterans very much so here you are.
Your situation reminds me of a message I received a year or so ago. It
came from an attorney who was expanding his disability law practice into
veterans law. He had been practicing Social Security law for quite some
time and that makes for an easy transition into VA law.
He was stunned at the misfeasance and malfeasance he encountered at the
VA. He was immediately exposed to the run-around of folders that couldn't
be located, attitudes of people who didn't want to hear from lawyers and
the overall terrible service we veterans have come to know and expect.
His comment to me was that, "The VBA makes the Social Security
Administration appear to function like a well oiled machine."
That should be a major embarrassment to the Department of Veterans
Affairs. Each member of the leadership of the 800 pound gorilla we call VA
should have wept at the truth of that. Any other business entity would
have hung heads in shame at being exposed that way and set about making it
better right now.
Not so at your VA. They seriously don't care. Congressmen criticize them
and they smile blandly with promises of a report at some future time. The
GAO or the VA OIG issues a blistering report and the VA replies with a
standard boilerplate of answers. Individual veterans lose homes and
families and VA ignores it and then twists statistics to show efficiency
gains where there are none.
Yes, now that the SSA has done the work for them, the VBA is likely to
approve your claim. Be prepared though, it's most likely to be approved on
an appeal in front of a DRO. It's rare that they get anything right the
first time around.
-------------------------
Jim;
I have a little issue I didn't see coming at all. I have been summoned to
do Jury Duty. I know they pay a Juror but I am IU thru the VA. I also know
some of these cases can go in great length. I'm 100% IU. Can I receive the
pay? How do I explain to them I can not receive any money's for my time. I
am sure these are just county employees doing there job. I just need some
insight on this is all.
Reply;
You can receive the pay. It isn't "earned income" and you don't have to
report it to the VA on the yearly questionnaire. The only income you're
restricted from is that which you earn by work and even then you're
allowed to make a small amount (about $10,000.00 per year) as long as you
don't work 12 consecutive months.
When you report for duty, they'll do the Voir dire and ask you your
employment and so on. Don't be shy about telling the truth about your
military/VA disability. Also don't be shocked if your status as a disabled
vet gets you struck rather than chosen. They seem to think we disabled
types are often too sympathetic to defendants and that we don't want to
hang 'em high. Go figure.
I've only been called once for jury duty and I served 4 days on a suit of
a truck driver v. his former employer. It was an interesting
experience and one I well remember. It's a very proud feeling to serve and
makes you feel very patriotic.
I was in San Antonio then and as a typical Texas jury, when we found for
the truck driver and against the employer, if it were left up to us we'd
have had a hanging party. We were really angry with the employer, his
DamnYankee ways were obvious to us and we wanted blood. Fortunately for
him the judge was cooler than all that and only awarded the plaintiff what
he asked for.
I haven't been called since. Maybe they knew???
-------------------------
posted by Larry Scott
Founder and Editor
VA Watchdog dot Org
-------------------------
-------------------------
Please post your comments below on Google
Friend Connect. You must sign in. For larger view and work
area, click blue "expand" button in upper right corner of comment box.
-------------------------
Don't forget to read all of today's VA
News Flashes (click here)
Click here to make VA Watchdog dot Org your homepage
(go back to VA Watchdog dot Org Home
Page) |



Military
Medical Malpractice
Legal
Network


VA Watchdog Stuff...
cups, hats, shirts...
click on item to order
and support the site.

|