The American Veteran's #1 Information Source
                                                   Click here to make VA Watchdog dot Org your homepage

                      VA NEWS FLASH
from Larry Scott at VA Watchdog dot Org -- 08-17-2009
 


  click above for details


 
 

 



VA Watchdog Stuff...
cups, hats, shirts...
click on item to order
and support the site.


Be sure to get all four
VA Watchdog dot Org
RSS feeds --
Daily VA
News Flashes
House CVA
Veterans' News

Senate CVA
Veterans' News

VA Press
Releases
 

 


Download your
free copy of the
2009 VA benefits
handbook here...

 

 

Printer-Friendly Version




----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

              Comment at bottom of page.

 

 

 

SCULPTOR CLAIMS HIS WWII MEMORIAL NOT PROPERLY MAINTAINED

"I'm ashamed. They paid me to do that. To me, it's a personal responsibility..."

 

NOTE from Larry Scott, VA Watchdog dot Org ... Go to this page for a better look at the WWII Memorial and its history ...
http://www.ga.wa.gov/visitor/WW2/WW2.htm

-------------------------

Sculptor says WWII memorial improperly maintained

By CHRISTIAN HILL
THE OLYMPIAN



OLYMPIA, Wash. -- The decade-old World War II memorial on the Capitol Campus is one of the most personal works of Olympia artist Simon Kogan.

Kogan, a Russian immigrant of Jewish descent who lost relatives during the war, has received thank-you notes from veterans moved by the memorial. As he explains it, these veterans entrusted him to encapsulate the toil and sacrifice of their war experience for future generations.

Kogan, 50, said it's this allegiance that drives his nearly 2-year-old dispute with the state Department of General Administration, which maintains all the memorials on the Capitol Campus.



He says that overaggressive cleaning in May 2007 damaged the memorial and robbed it of its most powerful feature. He has demanded that the state agency fix the damage or he will sue.

"I'm ashamed," he said. "They paid me to do that. To me, it's a personal responsibility which I'm not keeping up with."

General Administration said the memorial is not damaged and it hired a third party to ensure it was cleaned following standards defined by state law.

"It may not have cleaned it in the same way he would have done it, but,
again, we had peer review say the memorial is in good to very good condition," said Steve Valandra, an agency spokesman.

The dispute raises questions about the obligation of a state government with finite resources to uphold the artistic vision of a public memorial.

The memorial was dedicated on May 28, 1999 the Friday before Memorial Day and cost $720,000. Kogan, whose work includes the Motherhood sculpture on Percival Landing, was selected from among 42 entrants to design it.

The main feature is a cluster of five, 14-foot-tall blades that contain the names of the nearly 6,000 state residents who died in the war. Nearby, a field of 4,000 wheat stalks made of bronze referencing the first stanza of "America the Beautiful" symbolize this collective loss. Tiles engraved with the names of those who donated to the memorial are embedded in the ground and border the memorial.

John Lee, director of the state Department of Veterans Affairs, said his agency has received numerous expressions of concern about the degradation of the donor tiles. Many of the tiles are illegible, a condition that Valandra attributes to a combination of factors, including cleaning and the elements. Lee said the tiles would be replaced with a more durable material with money set aside by the Legislature for repair of memorials on the campus.

One of the donors who voiced concern is Mike Petrie, a captain with the Thurston County Sheriff's Office. He purchased a tile in honor of his father, Harold, a retired Army major who served in World War II. Harold Petrie died in 1999.

Petrie said he had heard about the condition of the tile but was taken aback by the degradation in the year since he last saw it. He said it took him about eight minutes to locate the tile Wednesday.

"The lack of care for a war memorial, I don't care for what war it is, really kind of soured me," he said. "It was very disheartening."

He added: "If we're going to take care of something on that campus, let's have it be the war memorials. That kind of an important thing for people to realize and to go visit."

The tiles are of secondary concern to Kogan compared with another element of the memorial.

In 2002, General Administration crews cleaned the memorial with instructions from Kogan. Five years later, the agency hired a conservation technician to assist the crews. This work included powerwashing. Valandra said the agency did not consult the artist "because we felt we would get appropriate work done by the conservation technician."

Kogan maintains this is a breach of the contract commissioning the memorial, which states: "Where possible, the Artist shall be consulted as to his/her recommendations regarding repairs and restorations being made during the lifetime of the Artist." Valandra said the state is not required to use Kogan.

Kogan maintains the powerwashing damaged the blades, wheat field and tiles. He said the cleaning destroyed the patina that gave color, form and contrast to the "ghosts" that framed the etched names on the blades. Kogan used chemicals to create this effect as an "invitation from faraway" for passers-by. He explained approaching visitors would then see and touch the names, establishing a connection between the living and war dead.

"The experience is gone," he said.

Lee said he hadn't heard any complaints about the loss of the patina.

After much negotiation, General Administration contracted with Kogan in September 2008 for his assessment and recommendations. Kogan was paid $30,000. Kogan's report concluded it would cost $123,553 to completely restore the blades and $84,115 to restore the wheat field. It did not address the cost of repairing the tiles.

General Administration then paid $5,000 for a second opinion from a conservator for Conservation Solutions Inc. of Sante Fe, N.M. In a report last month, it concluded the memorial was in "good to very good condition" and there was "no sign of overly aggressive cleaning" on the blades.

It noted the patina may not have been applied properly and may have been removed either by power washing or the application of a protective wax

"These are common alterations that can occur in the bronze during maintenance practices, but are not generally considered damages," it said.

It continued that the full restoration of the blades is not necessary or warranted partly because restoration would be temporary. It also said Kogan's estimate for the work appears to be high and that the estimate can be significantly reduced.

Last year, state lawmakers approved $288,000 to repair campus memorials, including $188,000 to repair the donor tiles, wheat stalks and blades. General Administration proposes spending $10,000 to replace the protective wax on the blades, a project that Kogan contends will only serve to preserve the damage.

Kogan's attorney, Clydia Cuykendall, wrote General Administration on Aug. 4 that Kogan will sue in federal court for violation of the Visual Artists Rights Act, breach of contract and copyright infringement if they proceed with that work. Both sides have expressed a continued willingness to negotiate a settlement out of court.

The federal statute provides artists that fall under its protection the right to prevent changes and damage to their works that prejudice his or her honor or reputation.

"If you broke it, you have to fix it, to put it in layman's terms," Cuykendall said. "To me, this is a small government project. This is not like doing a highway or something like that which costs a lot more money."

The state Department of Veterans Affairs has agreed to General Administration's course of action.

Lee, the veterans agency director, said Kogan "did a terrific job creating a most meaningful World War II memorial" but the issue boils down to money, especially for a memorial whose maintenance bills will run up in perpetuity.

"There's a dramatic difference in the repair cost," he said. "I think there's certainly a way to get there, and I don't think anyone would appreciate us spending any more money than necessary."

It isn't the first time care of a monument on the Capitol Campus lead to controversy. In 1979, light sandblasting was done to the Winged Victory memorial which honors World War I veterans and removed the patina that protected the bronze surface.

Ten years later, crews coated the memorial in a gold-color mix of acrylic and brass powder to protect it from decay. The coating offered protection but as it worn thin, the corrosion accelerated. The state spent $167,000 to repair the statue and coat it in the rich, brown color called for in the original construction contract. The restored memorial was rededicated in October.

-------------------------

TOPICS: veterans, veterans' benefits, VA, Department of Veterans' Affairs, Simon Kogan, WWII memorial

-------------------------
posted by
Larry Scott
Founder and Editor
VA Watchdog dot Org

-------------------------

Post your comment on this story using Intense Debate .....

 

-------------------------

Don't forget to read all of today's VA News Flashes (click here)
Click here to make VA Watchdog dot Org your homepage
(go back to VA Watchdog dot Org Home Page)



 
 

Military Medical Malpractice
Legal Network
       

 

 


VA Watchdog Stuff...
cups, hats, shirts...
click on item to order
and support the site.


 

   
Google
 
Web www.vawatchdog.org


FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such materials available in an effort to advance understanding of veterans' issues. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed an interest in receiving the included information for educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml   If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.