The American Veteran's On-Line News Magazine
                                                   Click here to make VA Watchdog dot Org your homepage

                      VA NEWS FLASH
from Larry Scott at VA Watchdog dot Org -- 08-28-2008
 



 


 
 

 


 



VA Watchdog Stuff...
cups, hats, shirts...
click on item to order
and support the site.






Be sure to get all four
VA Watchdog dot Org
RSS feeds --
Daily VA
News Flashes
House CVA
Veterans' News

Senate CVA
Veterans' News

VA Press
Releases
 

 


Download your
free copy of the
2008 VA benefits
handbook here...

 

 

Printer-Friendly Version





VA RESEARCH: BLOOD PRESSURE DRUGS MAY PROTECT

FROM SOME SKIN CANCERS -- Two classes of commonly

used hypertension agents have been associated with a

reduced risk of non-melanoma skin cancers in older veterans.

 

 

For more about VA research, use the VA Watchdog search engine... click here...
http://www.yourvabenefits.org/sessearch.php
?q=va+research&op=ph

Story here... http://www.medpageto
day.com/Dermatology/SkinCancer/tb/10677

Story below:

NOTE: If you wish to post a comment, go to the end of the story and use our new "Comment" feature.

 

-------------------------

Blood Pressure Drugs Linked to Protection Against Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer

By Judith Groch
Contributing Writer, MedPage Today

Reviewed by Robert Jasmer, MD; Associate Clinical Professor of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco Earn CME/CE

 

PROVIDENCE, R.I.,  -- Two classes of commonly used hypertension agents have been associated with a reduced risk of non-melanoma skin cancers in older U.S. veterans.

ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers were associated with a 33% to almost 40% reduced risk of basal-cell or squamous- cell carcinoma in high-risk U.S. veterans, Jennifer B. Christian, Pharm.D., Ph.D., of Brown University here, and colleagues reported in the Aug. 26 online issue of the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

Results of animal and in vitro studies have shown that angiotensin II may promote angiogenesis in cancer cells and, in turn, tumorigenesis. These observations suggested that blocking its effects could reduce the occurrence of skin cancer, the investigators wrote.

The researchers evaluated associations between ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers and keratinocyte cancer among 1,051 veterans (mean age 71) participating in the randomized VA Topical Tretinoin Chemoprevention (VATTC) Trial.

Of the participants, 532 had taken the drugs and 519 were nonusers. All the participants were at increased risk of basal-cell or squamous-cell carcinoma, having had at least two keratinocyte cancers in the five years preceding the study.

They came from six VA clinical centers in Chicago; Long Beach, Calif.; Phoenix; Oklahoma City; Miami; and Durham, N.C.

The veterans (mainly white non-Hispanic men) were followed from enrollment (November 1998 through January 2003) until the first basal-cell or squamous-cell lesion.

Participants were examined every six months by a study dermatologist, and biopsies were taken for all suspicious lesions. VA pharmacy records were used to determine use of the drugs.

During a median follow-up of 3.4 years, there were 472 incident basal-cell carcinomas, 309 squamous-cell cancers, and 200 deaths from any cause.

Compared with nonusers, users of the hypertension drugs had a statistically significantly 39% reduced risk of basal-cell cancer (incident rate ratio [IRR]=0.61, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.76) and a 33% relative reduction in squamous-cell cancer (IRR=0.67, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.87).

The combined absolute incidence rates for the two cancers were 237 per 1,000 person-years among users of the hypertension drugs and 374 per 1,000 person-years among nonusers.

The greatest reduction in keratinocyte cancer was seen among people who started use of ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers during the study period (IRR basal-cell=0.45, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.59; IRR squamous-cell=0.48, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.67).

The more pronounced reduction among those who initiated use during the study may indicate an immediate effect, the researchers said.

The investigators said they were surprised to find such a pronounced reduction in the skin cancers among these high-risk individuals over a short amount of time. However, they added, because individuals at normal risk of keratinocyte cancer were not included in the study, the extent to which these results might apply to normal-risk individuals is not known.

When three other classes of antihypertensive drugs -- calcium-channel blockers, beta-blockers, and diuretics -- were studied, the researchers found no association with the skin-cancer incidence. This suggests, they said, that the association reflects the specific biologic mechanisms of ACE inhibitors and ARBs and not their general antihypertensive effects.

Given similar reductions in keratinocyte cancer deaths with ACE inhibitors or ARBs compared with nonuse, the researchers suggested that the chemopreventive effects of these agents may reflect inhibition of growth factor activity of angiotensin II rather than prevention of neovascularization or an antihypertensive effect.

Study limitations included findings limited to high-risk individuals, and a potential misclassification of use of the drugs before the event. Many of these individuals could have stopped taking their drug before their diagnosis of skin cancer, thus being classified as users when they actually were not.

Misclassification could also have occurred if nonusers filled a drug prescription outside of the VA system.

Should the results for these two drug classes and keratinocyte cancer turn out to be causal, there could be a marked reduction in the combined incidence for these two skin cancers, the investigators said. However, they added, further research is needed to understand the mechanism of action.

"If these novel findings are confirmed in a randomized controlled trial, they may lead to prevention of these very common cancers, at least among individuals at very high risk," they concluded.

This study was funded by the VA Cooperative Studies Program, Office of Research and Development, Department of Veterans Affairs; the American Cancer Society.

Primary source: Journal of the National Cancer Institute

-------------------------
TIPS FOR POSTING:
Comments should be about the story on this page.  Respect others who have posted.  If you have a question for VA Watchdog... go here...

 
-------------------------

posted by Larry Scott
Founder and Editor
VA Watchdog dot Org

Don't forget to read all of today's VA News Flashes (click here)

Click here to make VA Watchdog dot Org your homepage

email Larry

Send this page to a friend:    

(go back to VA Watchdog dot Org Home Page)




 
     

Military Medical Malpractice 
Legal Network
               

 

 



VA Watchdog Stuff...
cups, hats, shirts...
click on item to order
and support the site.


 

 

   
Google
 
Web www.vawatchdog.org


FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such materials available in an effort to advance understanding of veterans' issues. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed an interest in receiving the included information for educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml   If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.