|


VA Watchdog Stuff...
cups, hats, shirts...
click on item to order
and support the site.

Be sure to get all four
VA Watchdog dot Org
RSS feeds --
Daily VA
News Flashes
House CVA
Veterans' News
Senate CVA
Veterans' News
VA Press
Releases

Download your
free copy of the
2008 VA benefits
handbook here...

|
Printer-Friendly Version
OFF WITH HER HEAD? by Larry Scott -- Norma J. Perez
is
still employed by the VA, even after writing an
email
urging subordinates to deliberately misdiagnose
PTSD. Her continued employment makes a mockery
of the VA's mental health care system.

For background on the Norma J. Perez email urging
subordinates to deliberately misdiagnosis PTSD (with backlinks) click
here...
http://www.vawatchdog.org/08/nf08/nfMAY08/nf051708-1.htm

-------------------------
Off with Her Head?
Norma J. Perez is still employed by the VA, even after writing an email
urging subordinates to deliberately misdiagnose PTSD. Her continued
employment makes a mockery of the VA’s mental health care system.
by Larry Scott
Looking through the State of Texas web site to document licensed
psychologists, you will not find the name Norma J. Perez. Yet Perez,
apparently unlicensed, is the post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)
coordinator for the Department of Veterans’ Affairs (VA) facility in
Temple, Texas.
Norma J. Perez is also at the center of a rapidly-growing controversy that
raises questions, not only about how the VA diagnoses PTSD but, about who
guides, or even controls, the diagnosticians.
On March 20, 2008, Perez wrote an email to her PTSD team, including
psychologists, social workers, and a psychiatrist telling them: “…I’d like
to suggest that you refrain from giving a diagnosis of PTSD straight out.
Consider a diagnosis of Adjustment Disorder, R/O [ruling out] PTSD.”
The subject line on Perez’s email read: “Suggestion.” But, let’s get
serious. In a government office when your superior makes a “suggestion,”
you can rest assured that it really is an “order,” and it better be
followed.
Why did Perez make such a “suggestion?” The email
begins: “Given that we are having more and more compensation seeking
veterans, I’d like to suggest…” Perez’s first thought was money! Her sole
reason for writing this email was to save the VA additional disability
compensation payments for PTSD.
She then verifies this money-saving agenda at the end of the email by
stating: “Also, there have been some incidence (sic) where the veteran has
a C&P [compensation and pension examination], is not given a diagnosis of
PTSD, then the veteran comes here and we give the diagnosis, and the
veteran appeals his case based on our diagnosis.” What Perez is saying is
this: By not diagnosing PTSD, then the VA’s assessment will coincide with
the C&P examiner’s assessment and the claim for PTSD is denied, saving the
VA the cost of disability compensation.
Now we know why Perez made her “suggestion,” but what does it really mean?
Perez has told her subordinates to make a deliberate misdiagnosis. Perez’s
actions are unethical, completely void of morality and could fall under
the definition of malpractice.
Perez’s
email also stated: “Additionally, we really don’t have time to do the
extensive testing that should be done to determine PTSD.” This mind-set is
a dereliction of duty. The job of Perez and her subordinates is to take
the time to make a proper evaluation and diagnosis, whether that is PTSD
or not. That is what they are paid to do. To suggest otherwise to her
staff tells us Perez has no concept of the requirements of her position.
Strangely, Perez has her admirers. A diarist at the web site ePluribus
Media dot com feels Perez has the best interest of veterans at heart. The
diarist states that using a “provisional diagnosis” of Adjustment Disorder
is proper because the veteran who has some PTSD symptoms may be having “…a
normal reaction to stress and it resolves within 6 months.” However, the
diarist overlooks the obvious. The job of Perez and her staff is not to
wait “6 months” but to evaluate, diagnose and treat RIGHT NOW. Because the
veteran needs help RIGHT NOW. If you went to a doctor with chest pains and
he/she gave you a “provisional diagnosis” of heartburn and told you it
could resolve “within 6 months,” you would find a new doctor, and rightly
so. The diarist also ignores Perez’s opening and closing statements
clearly referring to the costs of awarded PTSD disability claims, thus
taking the diagnosis aspects of the email completely out of context.
Norma J. Perez has disgraced her profession. She, perhaps, has put in
jeopardy the well being of many veterans. How many vets were misdiagnosed
at Perez’s suggestion during the nearly two months between the date the
email was written and the time it became public? We may never know.
But, there are those who do want to know. At least three U.S. Senators are
calling for investigations into Perez’s email. Sens. Daniel Akaka (D-HI),
Chairman of the Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, Richard Burr
(R-NC), Ranking Member on the Committee and Barack Obama, Member of the
Committee, have all called for immediate probes. Perhaps the most
interesting demand for an investigation comes from Obama who wants to know
if the Perez email is just an “incident” or if it is a “trend.”
Obama’s question is right on target. Is this an isolated incident? Is
Norma J. Perez a loose cannon who has caused the VA more unneeded bad
publicity? Or, is Perez’s email indicative of the policies being
implemented at VA facilities across the country? Anecdotal evidence
suggests that a diagnosis of PTSD is more difficult to obtain as tens of
thousands of older veterans, from conflicts going back to World War II,
are coming forward to seek help with their mental health issues.
Off with her head? In a professional sense, this would seem a logical
punishment for Norma J. Perez. If she does happen to be licensed, the
State of Texas should examine this issue. If she is a member of the
American Psychological Association, they should consider action. But, more
importantly, the VA should act now to make sure veterans are protected
from those who would seek to do them harm with a deliberate misdiagnosis.
Norma J. Perez should be fired for cause. Perez’s actions have caused
veterans to question the medical integrity of the VA mental health care
system. Vets will now be asking the questions: Have I received a correct
diagnosis? Or, am I being shuffled aside in an attempt to save the VA
money?
VA Secretary James Peake has stated that Perez has been “counseled” and is
“apologetic.” This is no consolation to the veterans who may have been
misdiagnosed or to the veterans who now fear the very system meant to care
for them. Peake said that Perez’s suggestion has been “repudiated at the
highest level” of the VA. What does that mean? Very little, because Perez
is still employed by the VA.
Secretary Peake’s message to all veterans is very clear. Perez’s
suggestion was repudiated by the VA not because it was wrong, but because
she got caught.
-------------------------
posted by Larry
Scott
Founder and Editor
VA Watchdog dot Org
Don't forget to read all of today's VA
News Flashes (click here)
Click here to make VA Watchdog dot Org your homepage
email Larry
(go
back to VA Watchdog dot Org Home Page) |


Military
Medical Malpractice
Legal
Network


VA Watchdog Stuff...
cups, hats, shirts...
click on item to order
and support the site.

|