The Nation's #1 Independent Veterans Web Site
                                                   Click here to make VA Watchdog dot Org your homepage


                  VA NEWS FLASH
from Larry Scott at VA Watchdog dot Org -- 05-02-2008 #1
 






 


 
 

 


 



VA Watchdog Stuff...
cups, hats, shirts...
click on item to order
and support the site.






Be sure to get all four
VA Watchdog dot Org
RSS feeds --
Daily VA
News Flashes
House CVA
Veterans' News

Senate CVA
Veterans' News

VA Press
Releases
 

 


Download your
free copy of the
2008 VA benefits
handbook here...

 

 

 

Printer-Friendly Version





PENTAGON CHANGES SECURITY CLEARANCE QUESTION ON

MENTAL HEALTH -- "There was no reason to be concerned

about seeking mental health counseling from a security

clearance standpoint. Answering yes has never been

a sole reason...for denying a security clearance."

 

 

This entire concept is bogus.

The fact that  the mental health question will disappear means absolutely nothing.

The system will remain the same.  And, the Pentagon admits that in the stories below.

So, why all the fuss?

Because it makes it LOOK LIKE they are changing the system to be more fair to those seeking security clearances.  Nothing is further from the truth...but, it makes for good public relations.

We have two stories...first is the DoD version...the second is from the AP.

First story here... http://www.defenseli
nk.mil/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=49735

Story below:

 

-------------------------

DoD Changes Security Clearance Question on Mental Health

By Fred W. Baker III
American Forces Press Service



WASHINGTON  – The Defense Department will change a question on its long-standing security clearance form referencing an applicant’s mental health history because officials believe it is needlessly preventing some people from seeking counseling.

The Standard Form 86, Questionnaire for National Security Positions, asks the applicant to acknowledge mental health care in the past seven years. It does not ask for treatment details if the care involved only marital, family, or grief counseling, not related to violence by the applicant, unless the treatment was court-ordered.

Officials said surveys have shown that troops feel if they answer “yes” to the question, they could jeopardize their security clearances, required for many occupations in the military.

As of April 18, applicants no longer have to acknowledge care under the same conditions, nor if the care was related to service in a military combat zone. The revised wording has been distributed to the services and will be attached to the cover of the questionnaire. The revised question will not show up printed on the forms until the department depletes its pre-printed stock later this year, officials said.

Article continues below:

 

DoD security officials said no one has been denied a security clearance based solely on the fact they received mental health counseling, but the perception that receiving care would jeopardize a security clearance, combined with the stigma of having to acknowledge the care on the form, may have been preventing some from receiving needed care.

“Our people see it as a major blemish on their record. It is one of the highest reasons given on these surveys for why people don’t seek mental health care,” David S. C. Chu, undersecretary of defense for personnel and readiness, said. “We want to be sure that our people are in good shape both mentally and physically.”

About 1 million security forms are submitted annually within the Defense Department. Of those, less than 1 percent receives unfavorable determinations based solely on mental health issues, Rebecca Allen, deputy director of DoD security, said. Of those denied, factors besides simply receiving counseling were considered, she said.

“The perception was unfounded. There was no reason to be concerned about seeking mental health counseling from a security clearance standpoint,” she said. “Answering yes has never been a sole reason … for denying a security clearance. It would be the resulting information that would develop during the adjudication phase that may … result in an unfavorable determination.”

But an Army Inspector General’s report last year said soldiers were hesitant to get counseling because of the fear of losing their security clearances. A recent Rand Corporation survey also supported those claims, officials said.

When determining a person’s ability to manage classified information, though, officials consider the “whole person.” There has never been from the security aspect a stigma associated with seeking mental health counseling, Allen said.

“We view that as a very positive measure,” Allen said. “There is nothing wrong with seeking assistance for a mental issue, just as there is nothing wrong with seeking assistance for a physical issue.

“There is every reason to seek treatment when you need it, … and it will not be a bar to your successfully receiving a security clearance,” Allen said.

Dr. S. Ward Casscells, assistant secretary of defense for health affairs, said the stigma of receiving mental health care comes in many forms within the military.

“One is that people are afraid they are going to lose friends. They’re afraid they’re gong to lose their chance at promotion. [Or that] if you show weakness will you be a good leader? Will people follow? Or will you be seen as someone who is out to just get a desk job?” he said.

But, Casscells said, mental health counseling is for all ranks, and has not stopped the progression of many senior military officials.

“We’ve got guys here with one, two, three stars on their shoulders who have had counseling. And they feel they’ve benefited by it,” Casscells said. “It’s your duty to do that. It’s your opportunity to grow as a person. It’s your opportunity to prove yourself as a leader.”

-------------------------

Second story here... http://ap.google.com/article/A
LeqM5jR80fyXWKdH2cTZVmwWBL45MVpbQD90CHJEO2

Story below:

-------------------------

Officials say Pentagon easing security clearance screening

By PAULINE JELINEK



WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. troops won't have to reveal all their mental health counseling when applying for security clearances under a change the Pentagon hopes will ease the stigma of seeking help for combat stress, The Associated Press has learned.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates plans to announce the new policy Thursday, according to several defense officials.

Thousands of troops are coming home from Iraq and Afghanistan with war-related anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress. But many hesitate to get psychiatric care because they fear that could cost them their security clearances, harm their careers and embarrass them before commanders and comrades.

Gates is trying to remove one impediment, revising a question about mental health treatment that appears on the form required by the Office of Personnel Management, the agency that does the majority of investigations for security clearances to military and civilian federal workers, officials said. They spoke on condition of anonymity because the announcement was pending.

Currently, Question 21 on the form asks applicants whether they have consulted a mental health professional in the past seven years. If so, they are asked to list the names, addresses and dates they saw the doctor or therapist, unless it was for marriage or grief counseling and not related to violent behavior.

The amended question Gates has approved is less stringent. It essentially means troops would not have to worry about therapy they got for difficulties caused by their wartime tours of duty or other missions, said four officials familiar with the revision.

"It is progress, I think it will help," said Paul Riechoff, executive director of Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America. "This needs to be followed by a mental health campaign — not just for service members but for their families as well. But I really do think it's a significant evolution."

Gates is to announce the change in the security clearance application at Fort Bliss, Texas, where he will visit a recovery center for troops with post-traumatic stress disorder, officials said.

Because the revision is only for military applicants and the question remains unchanged for other federal employees, the form hasn't been altered. Defense applicants will receive a packet including the application, the substitute question and a memo explaining the change and encouraging troops to seek treatment, three officials said.

The Pentagon says the perception of stigma for security applicants is far worse than the reality.

The most recently released data show less than 1 percent of some 800,000 people investigated for clearances in 2006 were rejected on the sole issue of their mental health profiles.

The investigation weighs a number of factors about the applicant, favorable and unfavorable, officials say. Troops can be rejected for a clearance if they've been convicted and imprisoned, are addicted to any controlled substance, have been discharged dishonorably from the service or are mentally incompetent.

Up to 20 percent of the more than 1.6 million who have served in Iraq and Afghanistan are estimated to have mental health problems, the Defense Department says. Though officials haven't released the number of troops diagnosed, a yearlong private Rand Corp. study estimated that roughly 300,000 may be affected.

Successive government and private studies have found roughly half of those who need help are seeking it.

The Department of Veterans Affairs says that about 120,000 of the 300,000 Iraq and Afghanistan vets it has seen for various injuries and problems have been diagnosed with symptoms of mental health difficulties.

Revising the security clearance procedure is just the latest in a string of efforts aimed at changing military attitudes on mental health:

_ The Army last year held special sessions to teach 800,000 troops how to recognize concussions and mental problems in themselves and their buddies.

_ The Army and Navy have put mental health professionals into primary care centers — rather than setting them off in separate locations — so troops can go for appointments discreetly.

_ The Navy is quadrupling to 30 from seven the number of special mental health teams embedded with Marine Corps units.

"What we are finding ... is that if we embed mental health professionals with our men and women on a daily basis, stigma goes down," the Navy's surgeon general, Vice Adm. Adam Robinson, said in response to an e-mail query. "This is because the mental health professionals become part of the unit. They become your friend in the mess hall that you see around that makes them more accessible."

Officials say they see signs the stigma has been slowly easing over the years, though it's still believed to be worse among those who need treatment.

Last year, 29 percent of troops in Iraq who had symptoms of mental problems said they feared that seeking help would hurt their careers, down from 34 percent the previous year, according to an Army survey of more than 3,000 people.

Nearly half said they would be seen as weak, down from 53 percent the previous year, and nearly 52 percent feared members of their unit might treat them differently, down from nearly 58 percent.

The majority of troops who get help are able to get better and to remain on the job.

The overwhelming majority of troops and their spouses recognize that mental illness can be successfully treated, according to a survey released Wednesday by the American Psychiatric Association, done online and from a much smaller sample size of about 350 people.

Still, many resist counseling until their symptoms worsen. Some go secretly to civilian therapists and pay for it themselves rather than going to military counselors.

"There's a pride and a bravado," said 1st Sgt. Andrew Brown, an Army reservist of Harrisburg, Pa., who has been diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder. "The feeling is that you are going to tough it out, cowboy up, get it done, suck it up — all the catch phrases that we teach young soldiers."

Ending up with nightmares, flashbacks or uncontrollable fear can be hard to square with that self-image.

Dr. Paul Ragan, an associate professor of psychiatry at Vanderbilt University, saw one side of the problem in his days as a Navy psychiatrist at a military psychiatric ward.

"I can't tell you how many times I heard from a gunny sergeant or a major who said, 'Look this guy's just weak, he just needs a kick in the rear,'" said Ragan, who retired from the military in the 1990s but still treats veterans as a civilian.

While that philosophy still exists to some extent, more commanders in today's military are trained to be able to spot mental problems, said Brown, who speaks on the issue for the IAVA.

"Young soldiers carry a lot of baggage, thinking 'combat is glorious and heroic,' or 'I'll be the first kid on my block to have a terrorist kill under my belt,'" he said.

 

On the Net:

* National Security Questionnaire: http://www.opm.gov/forms/pdf_fill/sf86.pdf
* Army battlefront survey: http://tinyurl.com/38zfmq

-------------------------

posted by Larry Scott
Founder and Editor
VA Watchdog dot Org

Don't forget to read all of today's VA News Flashes (click here)

Click here to make VA Watchdog dot Org your homepage

email Larry

Send this page to a friend:    

(go back to VA Watchdog dot Org Home Page)






 

Has Uncle Sam turned his back
on your request
for VA benefits?


Contact LEGAL HELP FOR VETERANS for assistance with the benefits you deserve.
click for more info


 
     

Military Medical Malpractice 
Legal Network
               

 

 



VA Watchdog Stuff...
cups, hats, shirts...
click on item to order
and support the site.








 

 

   
Google
 
Web www.vawatchdog.org


FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such materials available in an effort to advance understanding of veterans' issues. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed an interest in receiving the included information for educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml   If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.