|

VA Watchdog Stuff
cups, hats, shirts
click here to
support the site

Be sure to get all five
VA Watchdog dot Org
RSS feeds --
Daily VA
News Flashes
House CVA
Veterans' News
Senate CVA
Veterans' News
VA Press
Releases
VSO Press
Releases

Download your
free copy of the
2008 VA benefits
handbook here...

|
Printer-Friendly Version
FUNDRAISER CONVICTED OF RACKETEERING, CLAIMED MONEY
WENT TO VETERANS AND OTHERS -- The complaint
accused
the defendants of using deceptive phone
solicitations, in
some cases making pleas for money to pay for
services that
didn't exist and targeting vulnerable or elderly
people.

Story here...
http://www.chippewa.com/articles/2008/03/22/news/738p.txt
Story below:
-------------------------
Chippewa Falls man convicted of racketeering
By The Associated Press
EAU CLAIRE — The man who prosecutors say was the ringleader of a scam to
raise millions of dollars through deceptive telephone solicitations for
questionable charitable causes pleaded guilty Thursday to one count of
racketeering.
Duane J. Kolve, 41, of Chippewa Falls, had been accused of 13 counts of
racketeering but 12 counts were dismissed in a plea bargain that avoided a
trial scheduled for this summer, prosecutors said.
Eight people were originally charged in the scam two years ago, according
to court records.
Eau Claire County District Attorney Richard White said charges against
four were dismissed and three others pleaded to reduced charges for their
cooperation in the prosecution of Kolve.
“Everything from the beginning told us Kolve owned the charitable
solicitation business,’’ White said.
Article continues below:
(use left/right arrows in screen to view more videos)
|
Eau Claire County Circuit Judge Benjamin Proctor
sentenced Kolve to six years probation, including 10 months in jail with
work privileges, and fined him $20,000.
According to the criminal complaint, the defendants either owned or worked
as managers of fundraising businesses set up in western Wisconsin since
2002 that collected more than $10 million from about 450,000 out-of-state
contributions.
Prosecutors alleged that little of that money was used for a charitable
purpose.
The complaint accused the defendants of using deceptive telephone
solicitations to collect the money between 2002 and 2005, in some cases
making pleas for money to pay for services that didn’t exist and targeting
vulnerable or elderly people with solicitors trained not to accept no for
an answer.
The money was solicited on behalf of groups with names linked to law
enforcement, veterans and firefighters, the criminal complaint said.
Prosecutors said Thursday the scam skimmed off nearly all of the
donations, leaving between 35 cents and $2.92 for every $100 donated for a
charitable purpose.
The solicitors claimed the donations were for charities in California,
Louisiana and Wisconsin.
White called Kolve’s activities “reprehensible because they resulted in
the most unsophisticated and vulnerable members of our society being
victimized, without even realizing they were being victimized.’’
Dean Strang, Kolve’s attorney, did not immediately return a telephone
message Thursday.
The maximum punishment for racketeering is 15 years in prison, court
records said.
The following news release is a joint release of Eau Claire County
District Attorney’s Office (Richard White, DA), the Wisconsin Department
of Justice, and the Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade, and
Consumer Protection
EAU CLAIRE-- An extensive three-year investigation and prosecution
involving fraudulent charitable telephone solicitation practices engaged
in by a group of Eau Claire businesses was successfully concluded today
with the guilty plea of Duane J. Kolve, the person responsible for the
operation of those businesses, to a felony charge of Racketeering. Kolve
was convicted of Racketeering based upon his ownership or control of
telephone solicitation businesses which fraudulently obtained over
$10,000,000 in donations to claimed charities from in excess of 450,000
separate donations during the time period of 2002 through 2005. Three of
Kolve’s associates were earlier convicted of lesser charges in return for
their agreement to cooperate in the Kolve prosecution.
Eau Claire County Circuit Court Judge Benjamin D. Proctor withheld
sentence and placed Kolve on probation for six (6) years and ordered him
to serve 10 months jail with Huber privilege. Judge Proctor ordered
additional conditions that Kolve not own, operate or perform any work for
businesses or individuals engaged in the solicitation of donations for
charities and that he pay $20,000 as a financial penalty, with the initial
portion being reimbursement of the cost of this prosecution and the
remaining amount, up to the total of $20,000, being a fine.
These fraudulent telephone solicitation businesses skimmed off
approximately 85% of the donations. Individuals who ran the claimed
charities located in Louisiana, California and Wisconsin took further
amounts of the donated sums, leaving behind only between 35¢ and $2.92 of
every $100 donated, which was then actually utilized for a charitable
purpose.
This joint federal, state and local investigation and prosecution was
spear-headed by the Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and
Consumer Protection (DATCP), the Wisconsin Department of Justice (DOJ) and
the Eau Claire County District Attorney’s Office. Significant
investigative support was provided by United States Postal Inspectors, the
Altoona, Eau Claire, Grand Chute and New Richmond Police Departments, the
Wisconsin Department of Revenue, the Eau Claire County and Chippewa County
Sheriff’s Departments and the Wisconsin Department of Justice, Division of
Criminal Investigation.
FALSE IMPRESSION CREATED BY SOLICITATIONS
The fraudulent telephone solicitation practices which were the subject of
this case consisted of the Kolve companies providing false and misleading
information to donors from several states. The telephone solicitations
were deliberately conducted in a fashion to create the false impression
that these claimed charities in Louisiana, California or Wisconsin were
actually local charities in the states where the donors lived. The false
impression was created by use of “mail drops” in the solicited states,
together with techniques such as training telemarketers to utilize local
news, sports or weather information from the solicited states in their
solicitations and to speak in a regional accent and dialect.
The solicitations also consistently created the false impression that
extensive amounts of donated sums would be utilized for charitable
purposes such as purchasing needed safety equipment for law enforcement
officers, funding children’s burn camps, providing housing assistance to
homeless veterans and financially assisting disabled firefighters and law
enforcement officers. Telemarketers were trained to advise potential
donors that their donations would be “put to good use right away.” In
reality, only minuscule amounts were actually utilized for these laudable,
charitable activities (only between 35¢ and $2.92 of every $100 donated).
Several specific examples of the vast difference between the grand
proclamations of the claimed charitable activities and the actual
charitable activities were uncovered in this case. One of these claimed
charities, the American Veteran’s Relief Foundation, (AVRF) admitted in an
IRS filing for 2003 that only .35% or $3,750 out of total donations of
$1,070,224 was actually utilized for a charitable purpose. Another of the
claimed charities, the Association of Disabled Firefighters (ADF),
reported for the same year that it expended $14,330 of $2,659,374 in
donations for a charitable purpose, or literally 54¢ of every $100 raised.
Donors were not advised that shockingly few charitable activities would
actually be funded with their money.
FALSE STATEMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
Beyond creating a false impression as to the location of the claimed
charities, or the extensiveness of the charitable activities to be funded,
the fraudulent telephone solicitations which led to Kolve’s racketeering
conviction routinely consisted of factual mis-statements. For example,
literally thousands of donations to the American Deputy Sheriff’s
Association (ADSA) were obtained by, in part, claiming that, “I don’t know
if you know this, but deputies have to buy their own bulletproof vests,
taxes don’t buy them. So what the ADSA does is buy the vests and pass them
out. The goal is to get every deputy one.” In contrast, the investigation
in this case revealed that the general practice of law enforcement
agencies is to provide bulletproof vests for their officers. Since ADSA
expended only 36¢, 41¢ and 86¢ of every $100 donated to the charity in
2002, 2003 and 2004 respectively on charitable activities, this claim can
only be viewed as blatant fraud. In actual numbers, ADSA astoundingly only
expended $19,180 out of $5,391,787 in donations for charitable purpose
(benefits to deputies) in 2002.
That representation, and others like it, were contained in scripts
utilized by the telemarketers to complete these solicitation calls.
Multiple individuals associated with these businesses advised
investigators that Kolve was responsible for writing or approving these
scripts. Multiple of the seized AVRF scripts described the claimed
situation of veterans in VA hospitals by stating, “You know, the majority
of the guys don’t even have their own combs or toothbrushes!!” Contrary to
that assertion, investigators received information from the Chief of
Voluntary Services at a VA hospital in Madison, Wisconsin, that each
patient admitted to a VA hospital is given a welcome tote bag which
contains various personal items such as a toothbrush, writing paper, pen,
etc.
TARGETED VICTIMS OF SOLICITATIONS
One of the more disturbing aspects of the fraudulent telephone
solicitation practices leading to Kolve’s racketeering conviction involved
both the recurring nature of these calls and the fact that certain
individuals appeared to be targeted by them. Although the scripts commonly
contained language such as, “this year’s drive,” in reality, Kolve and the
people working for him routinely targeted the same individuals for
donations multiple times a year. Once a pledge was successfully obtained
from a donor for one of these seemingly unrelated charities, that
individual would then be repeatedly contacted by Kolve’s telephone
solicitors in an attempt to repeat that success for other claimed
charities. On November 10, 2004, Kolve’s solicitation company successfully
obtained a pledge for a $15 donation to a claimed charity known as the
Coalition of Police and Sheriff’s (COPS) by making various representations
including that the call involved “our drive going this year.” Seized
records of Kolve’s company show that this same individual had contributed
to that same charity two weeks before on October 28, 2004 and had pledged
over 18 times totaling $275 to claimed charities on whose behalf these
solicitation calls were made.
The investigation here revealed that elderly or otherwise vulnerable
individuals were commonly a target of these calls. One telemarketer was
advised by a potential donor that he was retired, had cancer and was in
pretty bad shape. The telemarketer was apparently undeterred and continued
to seek a donation by stating that he was sure that the potential donor
would “agree the job of an officer is one of the most dangerous in terms
of death or injury.” It was apparent that this sort of persistence by
Kolve’s telemarketers resulted in donations routinely being received from
elderly or otherwise vulnerable individuals.
One of the contributors who was exemplary of this pattern of repeatedly
targeting individuals who appeared to be vulnerable was a donor from the
State of Wyoming. It is astounding to note that during the 2½ year time
period of January 11, 2002 through August 3, 2004, Kolve’s company
successfully solicited this individual on six separate occasions on behalf
of AVRF for a total of $190, four separate times on behalf of COPS for a
total of $260, five separate times on behalf of ADF for a total of $335
and five separate times on behalf of ADSA for a total of $165. When
contacted by investigators, this donor stated that she may have received
phone calls from deputies, sheriffs and firefighters, but did not remember
any calls. She additionally stated that she certainly would not contribute
money to those groups. Contrary to the belief of this donor, the
accounting records from Kolve’s company showed that the above-listed
donations were received by the company.
Investigators received further information regarding the targeting of
vulnerable individuals in connection with a series of donations made by an
Iowa citizen. A review of the seized records of Kolve’s company reveals
that between 2003 and 2005 that individual had contributed $4,980 to
claimed charities for which the company was conducting telephone
solicitations, including $1,500 to ADSA. Investigators were advised by
this individual’s nephew that the donor was 61 years old, suffered from
mental and emotional problems and could not say “no” to people who asked
for money.
Given the information obtained during the course of this investigation, it
is hardly surprising that one of the telemarketers for a Kolve company
stated that, “It seemed like the people he called were lonely old seniors
who nobody has talked to for a long time.” Another telemarketer for that
company stated, “You would get a lady on the phone whose husband has been
dead for a year,” and you’re expected to keep pressuring someone in that
position for a pledge.
QUOTES FROM PUBLIC OFFICIALS
In discussing the amount of time devoted to this investigation, DATCP
Regional Manager Dave Tatar stated that, “hundreds of hours were expended
by DATCP investigators listening to taped solicitation calls by employees
of Kolve’s company.” As a result, Tatar stated that it was, “painfully
apparent that donors were routinely misled as to the nature of the claimed
charities, the extent of the charitable activities which would be funded
and factual matters regarding the charities.” Tatar summarized the DATCP
investigative efforts here by noting, “The expenditure of considerable
resources was well worth it here because it allowed prosecutors to hold
Kolve and multiple of his associates criminally responsible for defrauding
hundreds of thousands of individuals who believed they were donating to
legitimate charities. Hopefully, this case will deter others from engaging
in similar fraudulent telephone solicitation practices in the future.”
Wisconsin Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen noted that, “nationally,
criminal prosecutions of individuals engaging in this extreme fraud are
infrequent. But this conduct is criminally culpable, and civil remedies
may not adequately deter this conduct and punish this wrongful behavior.”
He went on to state, “I would like to think that this successful criminal
prosecution will encourage prosecutors and regulators from other states to
fully consider criminally prosecuting these extraordinary fraudulent
practices so that individuals like Kolve will not be able to simply
sidestep civil penalties, re-incorporate their businesses in a new name
and re-initiate their fraudulent practices. I thank District Attorney Rich
White, Assistant Attorney General John Greene from my office, and our
partners at the Department of Agriculture, Trade, and Consumer Protection
for their excellent work and forward thinking on this matter.”
Eau Claire County District Attorney, Rich White, stated that “Kolve’s
activities here were particularly reprehensible because they resulted in
the most unsophisticated and vulnerable members of our society being
victimized, without even realizing that they were victimized.” Equally as
important, he pointed out, “these fraudulent practices interfere with the
legitimate efforts of true charities to obtain support for their
programs.”
Investigators received information from one of Kolve’s associates that
Kolve had stated to her husband that his telephone solicitation business,
“may be unethical or immoral, but it’s legal.” Van Hollen and White noted
that, “the message of this prosecution is that those fraudulent telephone
solicitation practices were unethical, were immoral and were illegal.”
-------------------------
posted by Larry
Scott
Founder and Editor
VA Watchdog dot Org
Don't forget to read all of today's VA
News Flashes (click here)
Click here to make VA Watchdog dot Org your homepage
email Larry
(go
back to VA Watchdog dot Org Home Page) |

Military
Medical Malpractice
Legal
Network


VA Watchdog Stuff
cups, hats, shirts
click here to
support the site

|