|


VA Watchdog Stuff...
cups, hats, shirts...
click on item to order
and support the site.

Be sure to get all four
VA Watchdog dot Org
RSS feeds --
Daily VA
News Flashes
House CVA
Veterans' News
Senate CVA
Veterans' News
VA Press
Releases

Download
your
free copy of the
2007 VA benefits
handbook here...

|

DEMOCRATIC PRESS
RELEASE
June 24, 2008

Beyond the Yellow Ribbon: When the National
Guard and Reserves Come Home
Eight of the Eleven States with Upcoming Guard
Deployments Do Not Have Reintegration Programs
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Washington, D.C. – On Tuesday, the House Veterans’ Affairs Oversight and
Investigations Subcommittee, led by Chairman Harry
Mitchell
(D-AZ), conducted a hearing to evaluate the progress of the Department of
Veterans Affairs (VA) and the Department of Defense (DOD) in improving the
reintegration process for members of the National Guard and Reserves.
As was pointed out by witness Joseph C. Sharpe of The American Legion,
DOD’s reliance on the National Guard and Reserve in the current conflicts
is “unprecedented.” Mr. Sharpe, a reservist himself, testified that
“[r]eservists in Iraq and Afghanistan reflect a significant portion of the
total deployed force in any given month, and DOD reports that continued
reliance on the 1.8 million Reserve and National Guard troops will
continue well into the foreseeable future.”
“Members of Guard and Reserves units tend to disperse much more widely
upon their return than those in active duty units and it is more difficult
to ensure that they receive the services and benefits that they need and
have earned,” said Chairman Mitchell. “The need for DOD and VA to work
together to assist returning Guard and Reserves members, and their
families as well, is especially acute in today’s environment, where the
Guard and Reserves are serving at the same operational tempo as active
duty units. Fully half of OIF and OEF veterans are members of the Guard or
Reserves.”
Article continues below:
(use left/right arrows in screen to view more videos)
|
Mr. Sharpe and
Patrick Campbell of Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, a Guardsman
from Louisiana, both testified that, in the words of Mr. Sharpe, “a
majority of transitioning service members, of the Reserves and National
Guard, especially those returning from Operations Enduring Freedom (OEF)
and Iraqi Freedom (OIF) are not being adequately advised of the benefits
and service available to them from VA and other Federal and state
agencies.”
“Congress recognized the needs of returning service members in the most
recent National Defense Authorization Act,” said Chairman Mitchell. “The
NDAA mandates the 30, 60, and 90 day reintegration program and outreach.
The NDAA also requires DOD to create an Office of Reintegration Programs
within the Office of the Secretary of Defense and a Center of Excellence
in Reintegration within that office.” Despite this directive, the Office
of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) has not created the office nor has it
issued guidance to the Guard and Reserves components on how to proceed.
Witnesses from the National Guard Bureau and the Office of the Chief of
Army Reserve both testified that OSD has provided no guidance nor any
indication of how the required reintegration programs will be funded.
The Office of the Secretary of Defense refused an invitation to send a
representative to provide testimony on this issue. Instead, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Defense for Reserve Affairs provided a statement
for the record that claimed that OSD is “in the final staffing of the
Directive-Type Memorandum that will implement the Department’s deployment
support and reintegration program.”
The National Guard Bureau is already prepared to implement a comprehensive
national reintegration program. On January 29, 2008, LTG H. Steven Blum,
Chief of the National Guard Bureau sent a memorandum to the Under
Secretary for Defense for Personnel and Readiness pointing out that the
National Guard Bureau had already created a template for a national
program based on existing successful state programs, and offering “full
resources of the National Guard Bureau to immediately implement a national
home station transition support program for all Service Members and their
families, but particularly those from the Reserve Components.” OSD did not
reply to the memo. On June 2, 2008, General Blum sent a memorandum stating
that “pending receipt of OSD/RA’s Yellow Ribbon implementation guidance, I
have concurrence to publish interim Yellow Ribbon Service specific
implementation guidance for the National Guard.” Attached to the memo was
a detailed template for creation of reintegration programs designed to
fulfill the requirements of the NDAA that General Blum directed be
implemented.
Witnesses for the Guard, Army Reserves, and the VA testified that
successful reintegration programs require cooperation and participation
from DoD, VA, and the states. The witnesses testified that several states
currently have successful programs in which, at least at the local level,
the necessary cooperation and participation occur. However, Sergeant Major
Janet Salotti (Ret.) of the National Guard Bureau testified that of the
eleven states with Guard units scheduled to be deployed in the next year
and a half, eight do not have reintegration programs.
“Although Congress required DOD to develop a single national program for
providing support services to returning Guard and Reserve members, too
many veterans are on their own when they complete a tour of duty,” said
Bob Filner (D-CA), Chairman of the House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs.
“I applaud the states that have worked without implementation guidance
from DOD to provide very effective programs, like workshops to reconnect
with children, counseling for spouses and family members, marriage
enrichment classes, and counseling on legal and financial matters. Every
single returning veteran deserves to have access to comprehensive
readjustment services for themselves and their families. We know there is
a need. We know there are successful pre-existing models of support
programs. Today we learned that we are falling far short of where we need
to be to serve our troops and veterans. The NDAA is not a recommendation –
it is the law.”
Witnesses:
Panel 1
* Patrick Campbell, Legislative Director, Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of
America
* Joseph C. Sharpe, Deputy Director, National Economic Commission, The
American Legion
Panel 2
* Colonel Corinne Ritter, Director, Army Reserve Surgeon Forward, United
States Army Reserve
* Sergeant Major Janet Salotti, USA (Ret.), Chief of Reintegration, Office
of Joint Manpower and Personnel, National Guard Bureau
* Major General Marianne Mathewson-Chapman, USA (Ret.), Ph.D., ARNP,
National Guard and Reserve Coordinator, Office of Outreach to Guard and
Reserve Families, Veterans Health Administration, U.S. Department of
Veterans Affairs
Accompanied by
o Edward C. Huycke, M.D., Chief Department of Defense Coordination
Officer, Veterans Health Administration, U.S. Department of Veterans
Affairs
o Alfonso Batres, Ph.D., MSSW, Chief Readjustment Counseling Officer,
Veterans Health Administration, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
o Karen Malebranche, Executive Director of OEF/OIF, Veterans Health
Administration, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
o Bradley Mayes, Director, Compensation and Pension Service, Veterans
Benefits Administration, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Prepared testimony and a link to the webcast of the hearing are available
on the internet at this link:
http://veterans.house.gov/hearings/hearing.aspx?newsid=260.
-------------------------
posted by Larry
Scott
Founder and Editor
VA Watchdog dot Org
Don't forget to read all of today's VA
News Flashes (click here)
Click here to make VA Watchdog dot Org your homepage
email Larry
(go
back to VA Watchdog dot Org Home Page) |


Military
Medical Malpractice
Legal
Network


VA Watchdog Stuff...
cups, hats, shirts...
click on item to order
and support the site.

|