The Nation's #1 Independent Veterans Web Site
                                                   Click here to make VA Watchdog dot Org your homepage


                  VA NEWS FLASH
from Larry Scott at VA Watchdog dot Org -- 09-14-2007 #7
 







 

Tired of Going Around in Circles with the VA? Not Getting the Benefits You Earned? We Will Fight to Obtain ALL Possible VA Benefits. Admitted to U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans' Claims. Nationwide Practice.

DILLEY LAW FIRM
CALL TOLL-FREE
1-800-460-0111

click for more info

 

 



VA Watchdog Stuff
cups, hats, shirts
click here to
support the site






Be sure to get all four
VA Watchdog dot Org
RSS feeds --
Daily VA
News Flashes
House CVA
Veterans' News

Senate CVA
Veterans' News

VA Press
Releases

 


Download your
free copy of the
2007 VA benefits
handbook here...

 

 

 


 

Bookmark this page: 

Printer Friendly Page

VICTIMS GROUP SAYS CANADIAN AGENT ORANGE

COMPENSATION FALLS SHORT -- A group representing

victims says the decision ignores massive amounts

of other chemicals used at Base Gagetown.

 

 

For the article describing Base Gagetown Agent Orange compensation...click here...
http://www.vawatchdog.org/07/
nf07/nfSEP07/nf091307-5.htm

For more about Agent Orange and Base Gagetown, use the VA Watchdog search engine...click here...
http://www.yourvabenefits.org/ses
search.php?q=gagetown&op=and

Story here... http://www.theglobeandmail.
com/servlet/story/LAC.20070913.OR
ANGE13/TPStory/National

Story below:

-------------------------

Agent Orange compensation falls short, victims group says

by OLIVER MOORE



A limited number of people are being offered federal compensation for the spraying of Agent Orange at a military base 40 years ago, but a group representing victims says the decision ignores massive amounts of other chemicals used there.

The federal offer, which admits no legal liability to the victims, is a tax-free, lump-sum payment of $20,000. It can be awarded to people who lived or worked near CFB Gagetown in New Brunswick during the spraying of Agent Orange and who show one of a list of designated ailments.

The government believes fewer than 5,000 people will qualify under its terms, meaning the package should cost less than $100-million.

The spraying was done over a period of seven days in 1966 and 1967. Agent Orange, a powerful defoliant used extensively during the Vietnam War, was one of the so-called "rainbow herbicides" tested then, along with Agents White and Purple.

Those who believe their health was affected by this spraying have fought the government for years.

Veterans Affairs Minister Greg Thompson said yesterday that his government "regrets" that so much time had passed and that so many Canadians had "waited and worried while their questions went unanswered."

"We are proud to announce a plan that is fair and shows compassion to the thousands of Canadians whose lives have been so affected," he said, announcing the details of the compensation at a news conference in Fredericton also attended by Defence Minister Peter MacKay.

But Kenneth Dobbie, the leader of the Agent Orange Association of Canada, said it is "ridiculous" to focus only on those defoliants. He argues that the government is ignoring extensive use of the contaminant hexachlorobenzene from the 1950s to the 1980s.

"The gall to define this to a very tightly defined period of two years," he said in a telephone interview from his home in Kingston. "We had hoped that it would have been a fair package but it is totally inadequate."

Mr. Dobbie, 59, said the scope of the compensation offer, which is eligible to anyone who lived in any community within five kilometres of the sprawling base, is a clue that the government realizes the problem extends beyond the localized spraying of Agent Orange.

Figures compiled for the class-action lawsuit being pursued by Mr. Dobbie's organization put the number of people potentially affected by the decades of spraying at 315,000. The number could easily climb to more than a million if the descendants of direct victims are included.

"Those 315,000 may have had gene damage and could be passing along DNA that is defective," he said. "There's something terribly wrong [at the base]."

Mr. Dobbie said that his health began to suffer within months of the 1966 spraying. That summer he was a teenager clearing brush on the base as part of a government job-creation program.

He has been on disability for the past 17 years, suffering from serious liver problems, diabetes, frontal lobe atrophy, hypertension and thyroid problems, among other ailments. A number of his high school friends have died of cancer in the past two years, and his child has a disability.

"I can claim for the compensation but I'm not sure I'll take it," Mr. Dobbie said. "I'd rather see the bastards in court."

-------------------------

Larry Scott  --

Don't forget to read all of today's VA News Flashes (click here)

Click here to make VA Watchdog dot Org your homepage

email Larry  PGP key on request

Send this page to a friend:    

(go back to VA Watchdog dot Org Home Page)







 

Has Uncle Sam turned his back
on your request
for VA benefits?


Contact LEGAL HELP FOR VETERANS for assistance with the benefits you deserve.
click for more info

 

 



VA Watchdog Stuff
cups, hats, shirts
click here to
support the site








 

 

   
Google
 
Web www.vawatchdog.org


FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such materials available in an effort to advance understanding of veterans' issues. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed an interest in receiving the included information for educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml   If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.