Social Bookmarking
VETS' ATTORNEYS PROTEST VA'S "EXTRAORDINARY AWARDS"
REVIEW PROCESS -- "The effect is to create two
classes of
veterans, those whose claims were decided quickly
who will
get paid quickly and those veterans whose claims
were
repeatedly mishandled but whose payment will be
delayed."

Here is the first report from the NOVA Fall
Seminar in Arlington, VA. NOVA is the National Organization of
Veterans' Advocates, attorneys who handle veterans' claims.
A few days ago we had a story about the VA
reviewing all "Extraordinary Awards" arising from "Extraordinary Claims."
An "Extraordinary Claim" is defined as a claim "...with an effective date
retroactive eight or more years or that result[s] in a lump-sum payment of
$250,000 or more..."
The VA is having problems with their review
process...that story here...
http://www.vawatchdog.org/07/
nf07/nfOCT07/nf101607-4.htm
You will find the original story about the review
process here...
http://www.vawatchdog.org/07/
nf07/nfOCT07/nf101307-1.htm
Now, NOVA has challenged the entire review
process, calling it plainly illegal.
A letter from the President of NOVA is printed
below.
For more about NOVA, use the VA Watchdog search
engine...click here...
http://www.yourvabenefits.org/ses
search.php?q=nova&op=and
t how to get a VA Loan today -- Click Here

-------------------------
National Organization of Veterans Advocates, Inc.
“Providing Representation to America’s Veterans
and Their Dependents”
Nova, Inc.
P.O. Box 65876
Washington, D.C. 20035-5876
October 19, 2007
Bradley G. Mayes
Director, Compensation and Pension Service
Department of Veterans Affairs
Veterans Benefits Administration
Washington, D.C. 20420
RE: 211B
Gordon H. Mansfield Fast Letter 07-19
Acting Secretary of Veterans Affairs
810 Vermont Ave., NW
Washington, D.C. 20420
Dear Sirs:
I am writing to advise you that the implementation of Fast Letter 07-19,
Procedures for Handling Extraordinary Awards is ill advised and illegal.
It is illegal because, without submitting the rule to public scrutiny and
comment, you promulgated a rule somewhat similar to § 3.321(b)(1), but
instituted after a rating has been issued denying claimants the regulatory
rights of notification and opportunity to be heard provided in § 3.103(b)
and the due process rights guaranteed by the Constitution, of being
apprised of the rating and of being entitled to provide input into or to
challenge the review of the rating.
Rather than instituting a review with a CUE standard as in § 3.105(a), it
appears you have instituted a non authorized de novo review, which makes
the VACO reviewer the decision-maker in the case, but which does not
provide for notice nor for the a right to a hearing before the VACO
adjudicator.
Article continues below:
MONEY TALKS NEWS
VIDEOS -- MONEY-SAVING TIPS FOR YOU
(use left/right arrows in screen to view more videos)
|
Because this new procedure does not replace the
three-signature requirement for awards exceeding $25,000, this procedure
which requires review by the VSCM and then by the C&P Service is
guaranteed to delay the decision making process which has already been
determined to be too slow. Any additional time inserted into this slow
moving system is unacceptable to our veterans, especially those who are
elderly, sick or impoverished and who can’t wait the additional time.
Not only is this procedure time consuming, but the obvious effect of this
additional review will be to pressure the RO to deny these kinds of claims
or limit them. That is wrong. Eight years of benefits for cases which
result in appeals to the Court is not unusual and is closer to the norm
than not.
Designating these cases as containing "extraordinary awards" sends a clear
message that the VA hardly ever makes mistakes which should result in
large past due benefits and tells the adjudicators at the RO that they
were mistaken in authorizing such an award.
The veterans who are entitled to the large retroactive awards are the very
veterans who need it the most. They have been deprived of compensation for
so long they are way behind in their bills, and many are in danger of
losing their homes and vehicles. The effect is to create two classes of
veterans, those whose claims were decided quickly who will get paid
quickly and those veterans whose claims were repeatedly mishandled but
whose payment will be delayed. This is not right and plainly defeats the
stated mandate of the VA to serve our veterans.
Our veterans deserve a veteran friendly system which strives to correct
errors committed years before, not a system designed to prevent the errors
from being recognized and speedily remedied.
Sincerely,
Richard Paul Cohen
President
NOVA
-------------------------
Larry Scott --
Don't forget to read all of today's VA
News Flashes (click here)
Click here to make VA Watchdog dot Org your homepage
email Larry
(go
back to VA Watchdog dot Org Home Page) |