|

VA Watchdog Stuff
cups, hats, shirts
click here to
support the site

Be sure to get all four
VA Watchdog dot Org
RSS feeds --
Daily VA
News Flashes
House CVA
Veterans' News
Senate CVA
Veterans' News
VA Press
Releases

Download
your
free copy of the
2007 VA benefits
handbook here...

|
UPDATE: BUSH'S CARELESS CHOICE FOR VETERANS --
The president's nominee to head the VA oversaw a
military
healthcare crisis long before the Walter Reed
scandal.

Dr. James Peake
Today's article is written by Mark Benjamin of
Salon. He has written a number of powerful articles about veterans.
To read more of Benjamin's writings, use the VA Watchdog search
engine...click here...
http://www.yourvabenefits.org/sessearch.
php?q=mark+benjamin&op=ph
For five good reasons not to confirm Dr. James
Peake as VA secretary, read story here...
http://www.vawatchdog.org/07/nf07/nfNOV07/nf110107-1.htm
For more about Dr. James Peake, use the VA
Watchdog search engine...click here...
http://www.yourvabenefits.org/sessearch.php?q=peake&op=and
Today's story here...
http://www.salon.com/
news/feature/2007/11/05/peake/index_np.html
Story below:
Learn
More about how to get a VA Loan today -- Click Here

-------------------------
Bush's careless choice for Iraq vets
The president's nominee to head Veterans Affairs oversaw a military
healthcare crisis long before the Walter Reed scandal.
By Mark Benjamin
WASHINGTON -- Sick and wounded soldiers back from Iraq were warehoused in
dilapidated barracks, waiting weeks or even months to see doctors. Many
were not getting proper treatment for one of the signature ills of this
war, post-traumatic stress disorder. Buried in a blizzard of paperwork,
frustrated soldiers became ensnared in an Army bureaucracy that is
supposed to provide them with medical treatment and disability payments.
To make matters worse, separate efforts to care for soldiers by the Army
and the Department of Veterans Affairs were duplicative and confusing.
It sounds like the headline-making scandal over Walter Reed Army Medical
Center in early 2007, in the wake of which the Army surgeon general, Lt.
Gen. Kevin Kiley, downplayed the problems. But these kinds of nightmarish
struggles faced by ailing war veterans existed as far back as 2003, and
were brought to the attention of Congress before Kiley's tenure. The Army
surgeon general presiding over the crisis back then was Lt. Gen. James
Peake, who, like Kiley in 2007, sought to whitewash the situation. Peake
retired in July 2004 -- but now he's back in the news.
Article continues below:
MONEY TALKS NEWS
VIDEOS -- MONEY-SAVING TIPS FOR YOU
(use left/right arrows in screen to view more videos)
|
President Bush, who vowed this year to fix the
mess with veterans care, is pressing Congress to enact a slate of reforms
to help returning soldiers, including slashing the military healthcare
bureaucracy and providing better treatment for those with PTSD. And just
last week, Bush announced his nominee for the new head of the Department
of Veterans Affairs -- retired Lt. Gen. James Peake.
Although Peake was in charge when the wheels started coming off Army
outpatient care more than four years ago, there are no signs so far that
the Senate will reject his nomination to head the VA now. Peake was
wounded twice while serving in Vietnam and has more than 40 years of
experience in military medicine, according to the White House. He enjoys
the support of the American Legion, the country's largest veterans'
service organization.
But others are outraged that Bush has chosen a fix-it man who presided
over a broken system. "He is the wrong man at the wrong time, and Bush
should be ashamed of this betrayal," said Paul Sullivan, director of
Veterans for Common Sense. Until March 2006, Sullivan was a project
manager at the VA in charge of data on returning veterans. "Peake has
honorable military service," Sullivan said. "However, he failed in his
position as surgeon general to fix the Walter Reed problem when he knew
about it in 2003."
I first reported on the problems faced by outpatient veterans in an
article published by United Press International on Oct. 17, 2003, while
Peake was the Army surgeon general. Headlined "Sick, Wounded U.S. Troops
Held in Squalor," the article exposed some of the same kinds of problems
at Fort Stewart, Ga., that I would later write about at Walter Reed in
Salon in 2005 and in 2006, and that the Washington Post would write about
at Walter Reed in 2007. Warehoused in substandard barracks at Fort
Stewart, hundreds of soldiers waited for doctor's appointments and got
bogged down in the Army's disability paperwork, my October 2003 article
showed. Many wounded or sick soldiers at Fort Stewart believed that the
Army was trying to push them out with reduced benefits for their ailments.
But the problem wasn't contained to Fort Stewart; it was with the Army's
outpatient care system more broadly. I filed a similar article for UPI
from Fort Knox, Ky., published on Oct. 29, 2003, which discussed the more
than 400 sick and injured soldiers there who were waiting weeks and
sometimes months for medical treatment.
Following those reports, the Army dispatched some top brass to Fort
Stewart, announced new funding for housing there, and said it was rushing
doctors to Georgia to handle the patient backlog. Congress hauled military
leaders to Capitol Hill to explain themselves, including Peake.
When Peake appeared before Congress in January 2004, veterans' advocates
who also testified made it clear that Fort Stewart and Fort Knox were not
aberrations. The system was broken, they said.
At a Jan. 21, 2004, hearing before the House Total Force Subcommittee,
Steve Robinson, then executive director of the National Gulf War Resource
Center, testified that soldiers coming back from Iraq were locked in a
"battle for treatment, care and often fair compensation." He said the
problems were "directly linked to Department of Defense Health Affairs
policies." Robinson said that 10 days earlier, a soldier had hanged
himself at Walter Reed, and that patients with PTSD weren't getting the
help they needed. "There are shortages in qualified providers, beds, and
command emphasis to treat those who need counseling most," Robinson said.
He warned that "all of these things combine to create a healthcare crisis
if left unattended." Robison then listed initiatives that would help
returning soldiers, from increasing doctors to improving screening for
PTSD. He implored military officials to act, noting "systemic problems,
but they're solvable."
A soldier from Fort Stewart who testified at the same hearing, Sgt. Craig
LaChance, said that soldiers at the base were denied proper medical care.
"We lived in deplorable conditions," LaChance said. "We were stripped of
our dignity and threatened and made to feel as if we had failed the Army."
And Patricia Hicks, director of the Citizens Advocacy Center, warned at
the hearing that service members returning from war were facing a
"bureaucratic hell." She described one veteran who was "forced to make his
own medical appointments and was calling the medical centers trying to
schedule himself for the appointments and the doctor help the he needed."
Hicks said troops coming back felt that their "trust has been betrayed,"
that despite those troops' commitment to the military, "when they came
home injured, the military didn't maintain their end of the bargain."
In his testimony, Peake responded by lauding the Army's "extraordinary
quality of care, with the best people, well-equipped, well-trained,
well-prepared." He said the Army was "maintaining high standards as we
take care of family members back home."
Peake admitted that he had "stumbled" at places like Fort Stewart but
asserted that the situation had been fixed. "The good news is, I got
really good people out there who are ensuring that each soldier did get
quality care all along," Peake said. He said wait-times for doctors were
down and the Army had "upped the admin staff" to help patients negotiate
the bureaucracy. The new staff, Peake said, would "ensure things do not
fall through the cracks and there is that all-important individual
attention."
Not all veterans blame Peake for failing to fix these problems back in
2003 and 2004. Rick Weidman, director of government relations at Vietnam
Veterans of America, blames the Bush administration for trying to fight
the war on the cheap -- including penny pinching on outpatient care and
benefits. But he says generals like Peake need to make a stand and do the
right thing. "Do you resign or do you salute and follow civilian
authority?" Weidman asked. He wondered whether Peake, if confirmed for the
job at the VA, will have the gumption to refuse to march in lockstep with
the administration if he doesn't get the resources he needs to provide
adequately for veterans.
The rising number of injured veterans returning from Iraq may be wondering
the same.
-------------------------
Larry Scott --
Don't forget to read all of today's VA
News Flashes (click here)
Click here to make VA Watchdog dot Org your homepage
email Larry
(go
back to VA Watchdog dot Org Home Page) |

VA Watchdog Stuff
cups, hats, shirts
click here to
support the site

|