Printer Friendly Page
FORMER VA SECRETARY PRINCIPI BACKS PRESUMPTIVE
ELIGIBILITY FOR VETERANS' BENEFITS -- Anthony
J.
Principi: "You take care of the kid first, and
you
worry about the paperwork later."

Former VA Secretary Anthony J. Principi
Story here...
http://www.norwichbulletin.com/apps/
pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070513/CO
LUMNISTS11/705130314/1014/OPINION
Story below:
---------------
Column: Ex-BRAC leader lends perspective to VA scandals
By RAY HACKETT
Norwich Bulletin
I called a friend last week because I wanted to talk about some
disturbing news coming out of Washington regarding services being
provided to veterans.
His name is Anthony Principi, the head of governmental affairs for
Pfizer. Around these parts, Tony is better known as the former chairman
of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission, one of the
heroes who championed the effort to remove the Groton submarine base
from the Pentagon closure list two years ago.
Prior to that, Principi, a decorated Vietnam veteran, served as
secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs during the first four
years of President Bush's administration.
I wanted to talk to him about the Walter Reed Hospital scandal. The BRAC
Commission he chaired in 2005 recommended its closure. I also wanted to
talk to him about the controversy surrounding the bonuses given to
executives at the VA. I've always found him to be a straight shooter,
and was sure I'd get an insightful perspective on both. I wasn't
disappointed.
But first, a small distinction some might not know.
Walter Reed is not part of the VA system. It's a U.S. Army facility
under the direction of the Pentagon. The recent criticism being directed
at VA executives concerning bonuses in light of the Walter Reed scandal
is a bit unfair, since those executives had no control of the hospital.
"The average man or woman probably doesn't understand that," Principi
said. "And, rightfully so. Because it shouldn't matter whether it's
Department of Defense or VA. We should all be held accountable."
Officials' reactions
As disturbing as he found the news accounts of the poor treatment and
deplorable conditions in Building 18 at the facility, what really
angered Principi was the reaction from those in charge. And, in
particular, the comments of former Army Surgeon General Kevin C. Kiley,
the top official. When asked about conditions at Building 18, Kiley's
response was, "I don't do barracks."
"I would have fired him on the spot for that," Principi said. "When
you're in command, your men come first. The men under my command ate
first before me or my officers. They slept first."
But what's worse, he said, was the shadow the scandal now casts over the
work being performed at the main facility. The BRAC Commission did not
recommend its closure because services were poor. It was recommended for
closure because it is an aging facility.
"The care that our veterans are getting in the main facility is second
to none," he said. "The people working there are the very best."
And, so are the individuals at the VA who find themselves amid the
controversy about the bonuses, he said. He not only knows them
personally, in some cases it was he who appointed them to the positions
they hold.
"I'm very upset about what's happening to these very dedicated people,"
he said. "I can assure you they are hard-working public servants who
could be earning a hell of a lot more in the private sector."
Rita Reed, the deputy assistant secretary of the budget, and William
Feeley, deputy undersecretary for health operations and management, have
come under fire for a $1 billion shortfall in the 2005 VA budget that
failed to take into account the additional costs that would be needed to
care for wounded soldiers from the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. They each
received a $33,000 performance-based bonus.
Ronald Aument, deputy undersecretary for benefits, is taking heat for
his $33,000 performance-based bonus despite hundreds of thousands of
backlogged claims from veterans yet to be processed.
Not inappropriate
Critics charge that given the circumstances, the bonuses don't seem
justified. Principi disagrees, while admitting there are problems at the
VA that need to be addressed. But, he remains convinced the people
working at the VA are dedicated civil servants trying to solving those
problems.
"Look, I'm a fiscal conservative," Principi said, "and I monitored those
bonuses when I was secretary. These are good people. They didn't just
show up and work 8 to 4 and then go home. They were there late into the
night, and if I needed them on weekends, they were in before me and
still there when I left."
As for the backlog of claims, Principi has a simple solution --
presumptive eligibility.
"You take care of the kid first, and you worry about the paperwork
later," he said.
He declined to offer an opinion of VA Secretary Jim Nicholson, who last
week told Congress the backlog in processing claims is unacceptable and
personally promised to take responsibility for implementing much-needed
changes.
I don't know Jim Nicholson, never met him.
But I do know Principi. He is a leader, and he is passionate, especially
when it comes to veterans and those who are serving in the military.
We need more people like him in government.
Ray Hackett is the Norwich Bulletin's chief political reporter, with
more than 30 years experience covering politics on the local, state and
national level. He has covered Connecticut politics for the Bulletin for
more than 19 years. His column appears Sundays. Reach him at 425-4225 or
rhackett@norwichbulletin.com
---------------
Larry Scott --