Jon Town has spent the last few years fighting two battles, one against
his body, the other against the US Army. Both began in October 2004 in
Ramadi, Iraq. He was standing in the doorway of his battalion's
headquarters when a 107-millimeter rocket struck two feet above his
head. The impact punched a piano-sized hole in the concrete facade,
sparked a huge fireball and tossed the 25-year-old Army specialist to
the floor, where he lay blacked out among the rubble.
"The next thing I remember is waking up on the ground." Men from his
unit had gathered around his body and were screaming his name. "They
started shaking me. But I was numb all over," he says. "And it's weird
because... because for a few minutes you feel like you're not really
there. I could see them, but I couldn't hear them. I couldn't hear
anything. I started shaking because I thought I was dead."
Eventually the rocket shrapnel was removed from Town's neck and his ears
stopped leaking blood. But his hearing never really recovered, and in
many ways, neither has his life. A soldier honored twelve times during
his seven years in uniform, Town has spent the last three struggling
with deafness, memory failure and depression. By September 2006 he and
the Army agreed he was no longer combat-ready.
But instead of sending Town to a medical board and discharging him
because of his injuries, doctors at Fort Carson, Colorado, did something
strange: They claimed Town's wounds were actually caused by a
"personality disorder." Town was then booted from the Army and told that
under a personality disorder discharge, he would never receive
disability or medical benefits.
Town is not alone. A six-month investigation has uncovered multiple
cases in which soldiers wounded in Iraq are suspiciously diagnosed as
having a personality disorder, then prevented from collecting benefits.
The conditions of their discharge have infuriated many in the military
community, including the injured soldiers and their families, veterans'
rights groups, even military officials required to process these
dismissals.
They say the military is purposely misdiagnosing soldiers like Town and
that it's doing so for one reason: to cheat them out of a lifetime of
disability and medical benefits, thereby saving billions in expenses.
The Fine Print
In the Army's separations manual it's called Regulation 635-200, Chapter
5-13: "Separation Because of Personality Disorder." It's an alluring
choice for a cash-strapped military because enacting it is quick and
cheap. The Department of Veterans Affairs doesn't have to provide
medical care to soldiers dismissed with personality disorder. That's
because under Chapter 5-13, personality disorder is a pre-existing
condition. The VA is only required to treat wounds sustained during
service.
Soldiers discharged under 5-13 can't collect disability pay either. To
receive those benefits, a soldier must be evaluated by a medical board,
which must confirm that he is wounded and that his wounds stem from
combat. The process takes several months, in contrast with a 5-13
discharge, which can be wrapped up in a few days.
If a soldier dismissed under 5-13 hasn't served out his contract, he has
to give back a slice of his re-enlistment bonus as well. That amount is
often larger than the soldier's final paycheck. As a result, on the day
of their discharge, many injured vets learn that they owe the Army
several thousand dollars.
One military official says doctors at his base are doing more than
withholding this information from wounded soldiers; they're actually
telling them the opposite: that if they go along with a 5-13, they'll
get to keep their bonus and receive disability and medical benefits. The
official, who demanded anonymity, handles discharge papers at a
prominent Army facility. He says the soldiers he works with know they
don't have a personality disorder. "But the doctors are telling them,
this will get you out quicker, and the VA will take care of you. To stay
out of Iraq, a soldier will take that in a heartbeat. What they don't
realize is, those things are lies. The soldiers, they don't read the
fine print," he says. "They don't know to ask for a med board. They're
taking the word of the doctors. Then they sit down with me and find out
what a 5-13 really means--they're shocked."
Russell Terry, founder of the Iraq War Veterans Organization (IWVO),
says he's watched this scenario play itself out many times. For more
than a year, his veterans' rights group has been receiving calls from
distraught soldiers discharged under Chapter 5-13. Most, he says, say
their military doctors pushed the personality disorder diagnosis,
strained to prove that their problems existed before their service in
Iraq and refused to acknowledge evidence of posttraumatic stress
disorder (PTSD), traumatic brain injury and physical traumas, which
would allow them to collect disability and medical benefits.
"These soldiers are coming home from Iraq with all kinds of problems,"
Terry says. "They go to the VA for treatment, and they're turned away.
They're told, 'No, you have a pre-existing condition, something from
childhood.'" That leap in logic boils Terry's blood. "Everybody receives
a psychological screening when they join the military. What I want to
know is, if all these soldiers really did have a severe pre-existing
condition, how did they get into the military in the first place?"
Terry says that trying to reverse a 5-13 discharge is a frustrating
process. A soldier has to claw through a thicket of paperwork, appeals
panels and backstage political dealing, and even with the guidance of an
experienced advocate, few are successful. "The 5-13," he says, "it's
like a scarlet letter you can't get taken off."
In the last six years the Army has diagnosed and discharged more than
5,600 soldiers because of personality disorder, according to the Defense
Department. And the numbers keep rising: 805 cases in 2001, 980 cases in
2003, 1,086 from January to November 2006. "It's getting worse and worse
every day," says the official who handles discharge papers. "At my
office the numbers started out normal. Now it's up to three or four
soldiers each day. It's like, suddenly everybody has a personality
disorder."
The reason is simple, he says. "They're saving a buck. And they're
saving the VA money too. It's all about money."
Exactly how much money is difficult to calculate. Defense Department
records show that across the entire armed forces, more than 22,500
soldiers have been dismissed due to personality disorder in the last six
years. How much those soldiers would have collected in disability pay
would have been determined by a medical board, which evaluates just how
disabled a veteran is. A completely disabled soldier receives about
$44,000 a year. In a recent study on the cost of veterans' benefits for
the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, Harvard professor Linda Bilmes estimates
an average disability payout of $8,890 per year and a future life
expectancy of forty years for soldiers returning from service.
Using those figures, by discharging soldiers under Chapter 5-13, the
military could be saving upwards of $8 billion in disability pay. Add to
that savings the cost of medical care over the soldiers' lifetimes.
Bilmes estimates that each year the VA spends an average of $5,000 in
medical care per veteran. Applying those numbers, by discharging 22,500
soldiers because of personality disorder, the military saves $4.5
billion in medical care over their lifetimes.
Town says Fort Carson psychologist Mark Wexler assured him that he would
receive disability benefits, VA medical care and that he'd get to keep
his bonus--good news he discussed with Christian Fields and Brandon
Murray, two soldiers in his unit at Fort Carson. "We talked about it
many times," Murray says. "Jon said the doctor there promised him
benefits, and he was happy about it. Who wouldn't be?" Town shared that
excitement with his wife, Kristy, shortly after his appointment with
Wexler. "He said that Wexler had explained to him that he'd get to keep
his benefits," Kristy says, "that the doctor had looked into it, and it
was all coming with the chapter he was getting."
In fact, Town would not get disability pay or receive long-term VA
medical care. And he would have to give back the bulk of his $15,000
bonus. Returning that money meant Town would leave Fort Carson less than
empty-handed: He now owed the Army more than $3,000. "We had this on our
heads the whole way, driving home to Ohio," says Town. Wexler made him
promises, he says, about what would happen if he went along with the
diagnosis. "The final day, we find out, none of it was true. It was a
total shock. I felt like I'd been betrayed by the Army."
Wexler denies discussing benefits with Town. In a statement, the
psychologist writes, "I have never discussed benefits with my patients
as that is not my area of expertise. The only thing I said to Spc. Town
was that the Chapter 5-13 is an honorable discharge.... I assure you,
after over 15 years in my position, both as active duty and now
civilian, I don't presume to know all the details about benefits and
therefore do not discuss them with my patients."
Wexler's boss, Col. Steven Knorr, chief of the Department of Behavioral
Health at Evans Army Hospital, declined to speak about Town's case. When
asked if doctors at Fort Carson were assuring patients set for a 5-13
discharge that they'll receive disability benefits and keep their
bonuses, Knorr said, "I don't believe they're doing that."
Not the Man He Used to Be
Interviews with soldiers diagnosed with personality disorder suggest
that the military is using the psychological condition as a catch-all
diagnosis, encompassing symptoms as diverse as deafness, headaches and
schizophrenic delusions. That flies in the face of the Army's own
regulations.
According to those regulations, to be classified a personality disorder,
a soldier's symptoms had to exist before he joined the military. And
they have to match the "personality disorder" described in the
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, the national
standard for psychiatric diagnosis. Town's case provides a clear window
into how these personality disorder diagnoses are being used because
even a cursory examination of his case casts grave doubt as to whether
he fits either criterion.
Town's wife, for one, laughs in disbelief at the idea that her husband
was suffering from hearing loss before he headed to Iraq. But since
returning, she says, he can't watch TV unless the volume is full-blast,
can't use the phone unless its volume is set to high. Medical papers
from Fort Carson list Town as having no health problems before serving
in Iraq; after, a Fort Carson audiologist documents "functional
(non-organic) hearing loss." Town says his right ear, his "good" ear,
has lost 50 percent of its hearing; his left is still essentially
useless.
He is more disturbed by how his memory has eroded. Since the rocket
blast, he has struggled to retain new information. "Like, I'll be
driving places, and then I totally forget where I'm going," he says.
"Numbers, names, dates--unless I knew them before, I pretty much don't
remember." When Town returned to his desk job at Fort Carson, he found
himself straining to recall the Army's regulations. "People were like,
'What are you, dumb?' And I'm like, 'No, I'm probably smarter than you.
I just can't remember stuff,'" he says, his melancholy suddenly replaced
by anger. "They don't understand--I got hit by a rocket."
Those bursts of rage mark the biggest change, says Kristy Town. She says
the man she married four years ago was "a real goofball. He'd do funny
voices and faces--a great Jim Carrey imitation. When the kids would get
a boo-boo, he'd fall on the ground and pretend he got a boo-boo too."
Now, she says, "his emotions are all over the place. He'll get so angry
at things, and it's not toward anybody. It's toward himself. He blames
himself for everything." He has a hard time sleeping and doesn't spend
as much time as he used to with the kids. "They get rowdy when they
play, and he just has to be alone. It's almost like his nerves can't
handle it."
Kristy begins to cry, pauses, before forcing herself to continue. She's
been watching him when he's alone, she says. "He kind of... zones out,
almost like he's in a daze."
In May 2006 Town tried to electrocute himself, dropping his wife's hair
dryer into the bathtub. The dryer short-circuited before it could
electrify the water. Fort Carson officials put Town in an off-post
hospital that specializes in suicidal depression. Town had been promoted
to corporal after returning from Iraq; he was stripped of that rank and
reduced back to specialist. "When he came back, I tried to be the same,"
Kristy says. "He just can't. He's definitely not the man he used to be."
Town says his dreams have changed too. They keep taking him back to
Ramadi, to the death of a good friend who'd been too near an explosion,
taken too much shrapnel to the face. In his dreams Town returns there
night after night to soak up the blood.
He stops his description for a rare moment of levity. "Sleep didn't use
to be like that," he says. "I used to sleep just fine."
How the Army determined then that Town's behavioral problems existed
before his military service is unclear. Wexler, the Fort Carson
psychologist who made the diagnosis, didn't interview any of Town's
family or friends. It's unclear whether he even questioned Town's fellow
soldiers in 2-17 Field Artillery, men like Fields, Murray and Michael
Forbus, who could have testified to his stability and award-winning
performance before the October 2004 rocket attack. As Forbus puts it,
before the attack Town was "one of the best in our unit"; after, "the
son of a gun was deaf in one ear. He seemed lost and disoriented. It
just took the life out of him."
Town finds his diagnosis especially strange because the Diagnostic
Manual appears to preclude cases like his. It says that a pattern of
erratic behavior cannot be labeled a "personality disorder" if it's from
a head injury. The specialist asserts that his hearing loss, headaches
and anger all began with the rocket attack that knocked him unconscious.
Wexler did not reply to repeated requests seeking comment on Town's
diagnosis. But Col. Knorr of Fort Carson's Evans hospital says he's
confident his doctors are properly diagnosing personality disorder. The
colonel says there is a simple explanation as to why in so many cases
the lifelong condition of personality disorder isn't apparent until
after serving in Iraq. Traumatic experiences, Knorr says, can trigger a
condition that has lain dormant for years. "They may have done fine in
high school and before, but it comes out during the stress of service."
"I've never heard of that occurring," says Keith Armstrong, a clinical
professor with the Department of Psychiatry at the University of
California, San Francisco. Armstrong has been counseling traumatized
veterans for more than twenty years at the San Francisco VA; most
recently he is the co-author of Courage After Fire: Coping Strategies
for Troops Returning From Iraq and Afghanistan and Their Families.
"Personality disorder is a diagnosis I'm very cautious about," he says.
"My question would be, has PTSD been ruled out? It seems to me that if
it walks like a duck, looks like a duck, let's see if it's a duck before
other factors are implicated."
Knorr admits that in most cases, before making a diagnosis, his doctors
only interview the soldier. But he adds that interviewing family
members, untrained to recognize signs of personality disorder, would be
of limited value. "The soldier's perception and their parents'
perception is that they were fine. But maybe they didn't or weren't able
to see that wasn't the case."
Armstrong takes a very different approach. He says family is a "crucial
part" of the diagnosis and treatment of soldiers returning from war. The
professor sees parents and wives as so important, he encourages his
soldiers to invite their families into the counseling sessions. "They
bring in particular information that can be helpful," he says. "By not
taking advantage of their knowledge and support, I think we're doing
soldiers a disservice."
Knorr would not discuss the specifics of Town's case. He did note,
however, that his department treats thousands of soldiers each year and
says within that population, there are bound to be a small fraction of
misdiagnosed cases and dissatisfied soldiers. He adds that the soldiers
he's seen diagnosed and discharged with personality disorder are
"usually quite pleased."
The Army holds soldiers' medical records and contact information
strictly confidential. But The Nation was able to locate a half-dozen
soldiers from bases across the country who were diagnosed with
personality disorder. All of them rejected that diagnosis. Most said
military doctors tried to force the diagnosis upon them and turned a
blind eye to symptoms of PTSD and physical injury.
One such veteran, Richard Dykstra, went to the hospital at Fort Stewart,
Georgia, complaining of flashbacks, anger and stomach pains. The doctor
there diagnosed personality disorder. Dykstra thinks the symptoms
actually stem from PTSD and a bilateral hernia he suffered in Iraq.
"When I told her my symptoms, she said, 'Oh, it looks like you've been
reading up on PTSD.' Then she basically said I was making it all up," he
says.
In her report on Dykstra, Col. Ana Parodi, head of Behavioral Health at
Fort Stewart's Winn Army Hospital, writes that the soldier gives a clear
description of PTSD symptoms but lays them out with such detail, it's
"as if he had memorized the criteria." She concludes that Dykstra has
personality disorder, not PTSD, though her report also notes that
Dykstra has had "no previous psychiatric history" and that she confirmed
the validity of his symptoms with the soldier's wife.
Parodi is currently on leave and could not be reached for comment.
Speaking for Fort Stewart, Public Affairs Officer Lieut. Col. Randy
Martin says that the Army's diagnosis procedures "have been developed
over time, and they are accepted as being fair." Martin said he could
not address Dykstra's case specifically because his files have been
moved to a storage facility in St. Louis.
William Wooldridge had a similar fight with the Army. The specialist was
hauling missiles and tank ammunition outside Baghdad when, he says, a
man standing at the side of the road grabbed hold of a young girl and
pushed her in front of his truck. "The little girl," Wooldridge says,
his voice suddenly quiet, "she looked like one of my daughters."
When he returned to Fort Polk, Louisiana, Wooldridge told his doctor
that he was now hearing voices and seeing visions, hallucinations of a
mangled girl who would ask him why he had killed her. His doctor told
him he had personality disorder. "When I heard that, I flew off the
handle because I said, 'Hey, that ain't me. Before I went over there, I
was a happy-go-lucky kind of guy.'" Wooldridge says his psychologist,
Capt. Patrick Brady of Baynes-Jones Army Community Hospital, saw him for
thirty minutes before making his diagnosis. Soon after, Wooldridge was
discharged from Fort Polk under Chapter 5-13.
He began to fight that discharge immediately, without success. Then in
March 2005, eighteen months after Wooldridge's dismissal, his
psychiatrist at the Memphis VA filed papers rejecting Brady's diagnosis
and asserting that Wooldridge suffered from PTSD so severe, it made him
"totally disabled." Weeks later the Army Discharge Review Board voided
Wooldridge's 5-13 dismissal, but the eighteen months he'd spent
lingering without benefits had already taken its toll.
"They put me out on the street to rot, and if I had left things like
they were, there would have been no way I could have survived. I would
have had to take myself out or had someone do it for me," he says. The
way they use personality disorder to diagnose and discharge, he says,
"it's like a mental rape. That's the only way I can describe it."
Captain Brady has since left Fort Polk and is now on staff at Fort
Wainwright, Alaska; recently he deployed to Iraq and was unavailable for
comment. In a statement, Maj. Byron Strother, chief of the Department of
Behavioral Health at Baynes-Jones hospital, writes that allegations that
soldiers at Fort Polk are being misdiagnosed "are not true." Strother
says diagnoses at his hospital are made "only after careful
consideration of all relevant clinical observation, direct examination
[and] appropriate testing."
If there are dissatisfied soldiers, says Knorr, the Fort Carson
official, "I'll bet not a single one of them has been diagnosed with
conditions that are clear-cut and makes them medically unfit, like
schizophrenia."
Linda Mosier disputes that. When her son Chris left for Iraq in 2004, he
was a "normal kid," she says, who'd call her long-distance and joke
about the strange food and expensive taxis overseas. When he returned
home for Christmas 2005, "he wouldn't sit down for a meal with us. He
just kept walking around. I took him to the department store for slacks,
and he was inside rushing around saying, 'Let's go, let's go, let's go.'
He wouldn't sleep, and the one time he did, he woke up screaming."
Mosier told his mother of a breaking point in Iraq: a roadside bomb that
blew up the truck in front of his. "He said his buddies were screaming.
They were on fire," she says, her voice trailing off. "He was there at
the end to pick up the hands and arms." After that Mosier started having
delusions. Dr. Wexler of Fort Carson diagnosed personality disorder.
Soon after, Mosier was discharged under Chapter 5-13.
Mosier returned home, still plagued by visions. In October he put a note
on the front door of their Des Moines, Iowa, home saying the Iraqis were
after him and he had to protect the family, then shot himself.
Mosier's mother is furious that doctors at Fort Carson treated her son
for such a brief period of time and that Wexler, citing confidentiality,
refused to tell her anything about that treatment or give her family any
direction on how to help Chris upon his return home. She does not
believe her son had a personality disorder. "They take a normal kid, he
comes back messed up, then nobody was there for him when he came back,"
Linda says. "They discharged him so they didn't have to treat him."
Wexler did not reply to a written request seeking comment on Mosier's
case.
Thrown to the Wolves
Today Jon Town is home, in small-town Findlay, Ohio, with no job, no
prospects and plenty of time to reflect on how he got there. Diagnosing
him with personality disorder may have saved the Army thousands of
dollars, he says, but what did Wexler have to gain?
Quite a lot, says Steve Robinson, director of veterans affairs at
Veterans for America, a Washington, DC-based soldiers' rights group.
Since the Iraq War began, he says, doctors have been facing an overflow
of wounded soldiers and a shortage of rooms, supplies and time to treat
them. By calling PTSD a personality disorder, they usher one soldier out
quickly, freeing up space for the three or four who are waiting.
Terry, the veterans' advocate from IWVO, notes that unlike doctors in
the private sector, Army doctors who give questionable diagnoses face no
danger of malpractice suits due to Feres v. U.S., a 1950 Supreme Court
ruling that bars soldiers from suing for negligence. To maintain that
protection, Terry says, most doctors will diagnose personality disorder
when prodded to do so by military officials.
That's precisely how the system works, says one military official
familiar with the discharge process. The official, who requested
anonymity, is a lawyer with Trial Defense Services (TDS), a unit of the
Army that guides soldiers through their 5-13 discharge. "Commanders want
to get these guys out the door and get it done fast. Even if the next
soldier isn't as good, at least he's good to go. He's deployable. So
they're telling the docs what diagnosis to give to get what discharge."
The lawyer says he knows this is happening because commanders have told
him that they're doing it. "Some have come to me and talked about doing
this. They're saying, 'Give me a specific diagnosis. It'll support a
certain chapter.'"
Colonel Martin of Fort Stewart said the prospect of commanders
pressuring doctors to diagnose personality disorder is "highly
unlikely." "Doctors are making these determinations themselves," Martin
says. In a statement, Col. William Statz, commander at Fort Polk's
Baynes-Jones hospital, says, "Any allegations that clinical decisions
are influenced by either political considerations or command pressures,
at any level, are untrue."
But a second TDS lawyer, who also demanded anonymity, says he's watched
the same process play out at his base. "What I've noticed is right
before a unit deploys, we see a spike in 5-13s, as if the commanders are
trying to clean house, get rid of the soldiers they don't really need,"
he says. "The chain of command just wants to eliminate them and get a
new body in there fast to plug up the holes." If anyone shows even
moderate signs of psychological distress, he says, "they're kicking them
to the curb instead of treating them."
Both lawyers say that once a commander steps in and pushes for a 5-13,
the diagnosis and discharge are carved in stone fairly fast. After that
happens, one lawyer says he points soldiers toward the Army Board for
Correction of Military Records, where a 5-13 label could be overturned,
and failing that, advises them to seek redress from their representative
in Congress. Town did that, contacting Republican Representative Michael
Oxley of Ohio, with little success. Oxley, who has since retired, did
not return calls seeking comment.
Few cases are challenged successfully or overturned later, say the TDS
lawyers. The system, says one, is essentially broken. "Right now, the
Army is eating its own. What I want to see is these soldiers getting the
right diagnosis, so they can get the right help, not be thrown to the
wolves right away. That is what they're doing."
Still, Town tries to remain undaunted. He got his story to Robinson of
Veterans for America, who brought papers on his case to an October
meeting with several top Washington officials, including Deputy Surgeon
General Gale Pollock, Assistant Surgeon General Bernard DeKoning and
Republican Senator Kit Bond of Missouri. There Robinson laid out the
larger 5-13 problem and submitted a briefing specifically on Town.
"We got a very positive response," Robinson says. "After we presented,
they were almost appalled, like we are every day. They said, 'We didn't
know this was happening.'" Robinson says the deputy surgeon general
promised to look into Town's case and the others presented to her.
Senator Bond, whose son has served in Iraq, floated the idea of a
Congressional hearing if the 5-13 issue isn't resolved. The senator did
not return calls seeking comment.
In the meantime, Town is doing his best to keep his head in check. He
says his nightmares have been waning in recent weeks, but most of his
problems persist. He's thinking of going to a veterans support group in
Toledo, forty-five miles north of Findlay. There will be guys there who
have been through this, he says, vets who understand.
Town hesitates, his voice suddenly much softer. "I have my good days and
my bad days," he says. "It all depends on whether I wake up in Findlay
or Iraq."
---------------
Larry Scott --
Don't forget to read all of today's VA
News Flashes
(click here)
If
you're military, you need to know VA Joe. Active
military forum and comedy
contests along with updates on VA benefits through the
GI Bill program, all from
Joe -- Sign up today.
Be sure to get all four
VA Watchdog dot Org
RSS feeds --
Daily VA
News Flashes
House CVA
Veterans' News
Senate CVA
Veterans' News
VA Press
Releases
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which
has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are
making such materials available in an effort to advance understanding of veterans' issues. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such
copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright
Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this
site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed an interest
in receiving the included information for educational purposes. For more
information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml If you wish
to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that
go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.