Printer Friendly Page
ONCE AGAIN, NO MENTION OF VETERANS IN STATE OF
THE
UNION ADDRESS -- For years, veterans have been
ignored
in the State of the Union Address. Have vets
become a forgotten minority? Democratic
response offers no better.

Once again, veterans were left out of the
State of the Union Address in 2007.
On Capitol Hill, veterans are just
another minority...and, a small minority, at that.
There are 24.5 million veterans in the
United States. That's just a little more than 8% of the
population. The VA will see about 7 million veterans in their
facilities this year. That's just slightly more than 2% of the
population.
So, even taking the 8% figure, veterans
are a small, small minority. Our influence on Capitol Hill has
been eroded to the point where we can't even get a 10-second mention in
the State of the Union Address.
This causes me great pain.
Did the President forget us? Does
he know we are here?
Veterans deserve better. It's time
to DEMAND better!
State of the Union Address here...
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16672456/
Address below:
Below the State of the Union Address is
the Democratic Response which, also, offers nothing to veterans.
---------------
Full text of 2007 State of the Union speech
As prepared for delivery by President George W.
Bush, Jan. 23, 2007
Madam Speaker, Vice President Cheney, Members of Congress, distinguished
guests, and fellow citizens:
This rite of custom brings us together at a defining hour — when
decisions are hard and courage is needed. We enter the year 2007 with
large endeavors underway, and others that are ours to begin. In all of
this, much is asked of us. We must have the will to face difficult
challenges and determined enemies — and the wisdom to face them
together.
Some in this Chamber are new to the House and Senate — and I
congratulate the Democratic majority. Congress has changed, but not our
responsibilities. Each of us is guided by our own convictions — and to
these we must stay faithful. Yet we are all held to the same standards,
and called to serve the same good purposes: To extend this Nation’s
prosperity ... to spend the people’s money wisely ... to solve problems,
not leave them to future generations ... to guard America against all
evil, and to keep faith with those we have sent forth to defend us.
We are not the first to come here with a government divided and
uncertainty in the air. Like many before us, we can work through our
differences, and we can achieve big things for the American people. Our
citizens don’t much care which side of the aisle we sit on — as long as
we are willing to cross that aisle when there is work to be done. Our
job is to make life better for our fellow Americans, and help them to
build a future of hope and opportunity — and this is the business before
us tonight.
A future of hope and opportunity begins with a growing economy — and
that is what we have. We are now in the 41st month of uninterrupted job
growth — a recovery that has created 7.2 million new jobs ... so far.
Unemployment is low, inflation is low, and wages are rising. This
economy is on the move — and our job is to keep it that way, not with
more government but with more enterprise.
Next week, I will deliver a full report on the state of our economy.
Tonight, I want to discuss three economic reforms that deserve to be
priorities for this Congress.
First, we must balance the federal budget. We can do so without raising
taxes. What we need to do is impose spending discipline in Washington,
D.C. We set a goal of cutting the deficit in half by 2009 -- and met
that goal three years ahead of schedule. Now let us take the next step.
In the coming weeks, I will submit a budget that eliminates the federal
deficit within the next five years. I ask you to make the same
commitment. Together, we can restrain the spending appetite of the
federal government, and we can balance the federal budget.
Next, there is the matter of earmarks. These special interest items are
often slipped into bills at the last hour — when not even C-SPAN is
watching. In 2005 alone, the number of earmarks grew to over 13,000 and
totaled nearly $18 billion. Even worse, over 90 percent of earmarks
never make it to the floor of the House and Senate — they are dropped
into Committee reports that are not even part of the bill that arrives
on my desk. You didn't vote them into law. I didn't sign them into law.
Yet they are treated as if they have the force of law. The time has come
to end this practice. So let us work together to reform the budget
process ... expose every earmark to the light of day and to a vote in
Congress ... and cut the number and cost of earmarks at least in half by
the end of this session.
Finally, to keep this economy strong we must take on the challenge of
entitlements. Social Security and Medicare and Medicaid are commitments
of conscience — and so it is our duty to keep them permanently sound.
Yet we are failing in that duty — and this failure will one day leave
our children with three bad options: huge tax increases, huge deficits,
or huge and immediate cuts in benefits. Everyone in this Chamber knows
this to be true — yet somehow we have not found it in ourselves to act.
So let us work together and do it now. With enough good sense and good
will, you and I can fix Medicare and Medicaid — and save Social
Security.
Spreading opportunity and hope in America also requires public schools
that give children the knowledge and character they need in life. Five
years ago, we rose above partisan differences to pass the No Child Left
Behind Act — preserving local control, raising standards and holding
schools accountable for results. And because we acted, students are
performing better in reading and math, minority students are closing the
achievement gap.
Now the task is to build on this success, without watering down
standards ... without taking control from local communities ... and
without backsliding and calling it reform. We can lift student
achievement even higher by giving local leaders flexibility to turn
around failing schools ... and by giving families with children stuck in
failing schools the right to choose some place better. We must increase
funds for students who struggle — and make sure these children get the
special help they need. And we can make sure our children are prepared
for the jobs of the future, and our country is more competitive, by
strengthening math and science skills. The No Child Left Behind Act has
worked for America’s children — and I ask Congress to reauthorize this
good law.
A future of hope and opportunity requires that all our citizens have
affordable and available healthcare. When it comes to healthcare,
government has an obligation to care for the elderly, the disabled, and
poor children and we will meet those responsibilities. For all other
Americans, private health insurance is the best way to meet their needs.
But many Americans cannot afford a health insurance policy.
And so tonight, I propose two new initiatives to help more Americans
afford their own insurance. First, I propose a standard tax deduction
for health insurance that will be like the standard tax deduction for
dependents. Families with health insurance will pay no income or payroll
taxes on $15,000 of their income. Single Americans with health insurance
will pay no income or payroll taxes on $7,500 of their income. With this
reform, more than 100 million men, women, and children who are now
covered by employer-provided insurance will benefit from lower tax
bills.
At the same time, this reform will level the playing field for those who
do not get health insurance through their job. For Americans who now
purchase health insurance on their own, this proposal would mean a
substantial tax savings -- $4,500 for a family of four making $60,000 a
year. And for the millions of other Americans who have no health
insurance at all, this deduction would help put a basic private health
insurance plan within their reach. Changing the tax code is a vital and
necessary step to making healthcare affordable for more Americans.
My second proposal is to help the states that are coming up with
innovative ways to cover the uninsured. States that make basic private
health insurance available to all their citizens should receive federal
funds to help them provide this coverage to the poor and the sick. I
have asked the Secretary of Health and Human Services to work with
Congress to take existing federal funds and use them to create
“Affordable Choices” grants. These grants would give our Nation’s
governors more money and more flexibility to get private health
insurance to those most in need.
There are many other ways that Congress can help. We need to expand
Health Savings Accounts ... we need to help small businesses through
Association Health Plans ... we need to reduce costs and medical errors
with better information technology ... we will encourage price
transparency ... and to protect good doctors from junk lawsuits we need
to pass medical liability reform. And in all we do, we must remember
that the best healthcare decisions are not made by government and
insurance companies, but by patients and their doctors.
Extending hope and opportunity in our country requires an immigration
system worthy of America — with laws that are fair and borders that are
secure. When laws and borders are routinely violated, this harms the
interests of our country. To secure our border, we are doubling the size
of the Border Patrol — and funding new infrastructure and technology.
Yet even with all these steps, we cannot fully secure the border unless
we take pressure off the border — and that requires a temporary worker
program. We should establish a legal and orderly path for foreign
workers to enter our country to work on a temporary basis. As a result,
they won’t have to try to sneak in — and that will leave border agents
free to chase down drug smugglers, and criminals, and terrorists. We
will enforce our immigration laws at the worksite, and give employers
the tools to verify the legal status of their workers — so there is no
excuse left for violating the law. We need to uphold the great tradition
of the melting pot that welcomes and assimilates new arrivals. We need
to resolve the status of the illegal immigrants who are already in our
country — without animosity and without amnesty.
Convictions run deep in this Capitol when it comes to immigration. Let
us have a serious, civil, and conclusive debate — so that you can pass,
and I can sign, comprehensive immigration reform into law.
Extending hope and opportunity depends on a stable supply of energy that
keeps America’s economy running and America’s environment clean. For too
long our Nation has been dependent on foreign oil. And this dependence
leaves us more vulnerable to hostile regimes, and to terrorists — who
could cause huge disruptions of oil shipments ... and raise the price of
oil ... and do great harm to our economy.
It is in our vital interest to diversify America’s energy supply — and
the way forward is through technology. We must continue changing the way
America generates electric power — by even greater use of clean coal
technology ... solar and wind energy ... and clean, safe nuclear power.
We need to press on with battery research for plug-in and hybrid
vehicles, and expand the use of clean diesel vehicles and biodiesel
fuel. We must continue investing in new methods of producing ethanol —
using everything from wood chips, to grasses, to agricultural wastes.
We have made a lot of progress, thanks to good policies here in
Washington and the strong response of the market. And now even more
dramatic advances are within reach. Tonight, I ask Congress to join me
in pursuing a great goal. Let us build on the work we have done and
reduce gasoline usage in the United States by 20 percent in the next ten
years — when we do that we will have cut our total imports by the
equivalent of three-quarters of all the oil we now import from the
Middle East.
To reach this goal, we must increase the supply of alternative fuels, by
setting a mandatory Fuels Standard to require 35 billion gallons of
renewable and alternative fuels in 2017 -- and this is nearly five times
the current target. At the same time, we need to reform and modernize
fuel economy standards for cars the way we did for light trucks — and
conserve up to eight and a half billion more gallons of gasoline by
2017.
Achieving these ambitious goals will dramatically reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, but it's not going to eliminate it. So as we continue to
diversify our fuel supply, we must also step up domestic oil production
in environmentally sensitive ways. And to further protect America
against severe disruptions to our oil supply, I ask Congress to double
the current capacity of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve.
America is on the verge of technological breakthroughs that will enable
us to live our lives less dependent on oil. And these technologies will
help us bebetter stewards of the environment — and they will help us to
confront the serious challenge of global climate change.
A future of hope and opportunity requires a fair, impartial system of
justice. The lives of citizens across our Nation are affected by the
outcome of cases pending in our federal courts. And we have a shared
obligation to ensure that the federal courts have enough judges to hear
those cases and deliver timely rulings. As President, I have a duty to
nominate qualified men and women to vacancies on the federal bench. And
the United States Senate has a duty as well — to give those nominees a
fair hearing, and a prompt up-or-down vote on the Senate floor.
For all of us in this room, there is no higher responsibility than to
protect the people of this country from danger. Five years have come and
gone since we saw the scenes and felt the sorrow that the terrorists can
cause. We've had time to take stock of our situation. We've added many
critical protections to guard the homeland. We know with certainty that
the horrors of that September morning were just a glimpse of what the
terrorists intend for us — unless we stop them.
With the distance of time, we find ourselves debating the causes of
conflict and the course we have followed. Such debates are essential
when a great democracy faces great questions. Yet one question has
surely been settled — that to win the war on terror we must take the
fight to the enemy.
From the start, America and our allies have protected our people by
staying on the offense. The enemy knows that the days of comfortable
sanctuary, easy movement, steady financing, and free flowing
communications are long over. For the terrorists, life since Nine-Eleven
has never been the same.
Our success in this war is often measured by the things that did not
happen. We cannot know the full extent of the attacks that we and our
allies have prevented — but here is some of what we do know: We stopped
an al Qaeda plot to fly a hijacked airplane into the tallest building on
the West Coast. We broke up a Southeast Asian terrorist cell grooming
operatives for attacks inside the United States. We uncovered an al
Qaeda cell developing anthrax to be used in attacks against America. And
just last August, British authorities uncovered a plot to blow up
passenger planes bound for America over the Atlantic Ocean. For each
life saved, we owe a debt of gratitude to the brave public servants who
devote their lives to finding the terrorists and stopping them.
Every success against the terrorists is a reminder of the shoreless
ambitions of this enemy. The evil that inspired and rejoiced in
Nine-Eleven is still at work in the world. And so long as that's the
case, America is still a Nation at war.
In the minds of the terrorists, this war began well before September
11th, and will not end until their radical vision is fulfilled. And
these past five years have given us a much clearer view of the nature of
this enemy. Al Qaeda and its followers are Sunni extremists, possessed
by hatred and commanded by a harsh and narrow ideology. Take almost any
principle of civilization, and their goal is the opposite. They preach
with threats ... instruct with bullets and bombs ... and promise
paradise for the murder of the innocent.
Our enemies are quite explicit about their intentions. They want to
overthrow moderate governments, and establish safe havens from which to
plan and carry out new attacks on our country. By killing and
terrorizing Americans, they want to force our country to retreat from
the world and abandon the cause of liberty. They would then be free to
impose their will and spread their totalitarian ideology. Listen to this
warning from the late terrorist Zarqawi: “We will sacrifice our blood
and bodies to put an end to your dreams, and what is coming is even
worse.” And Osama bin Laden declared: “Death is better than living on
this Earth with the unbelievers among us.”
These men are not given to idle words, and they are just one camp in the
Islamist radical movement. In recent times, it has also become clear
that we face an escalating danger from Shia extremists who are just as
hostile to America, and are also determined to dominate the Middle East.
Many are known to take direction from the regime in Iran, which is
funding and arming terrorists like Hezbollah — a group second only to al
Qaeda in the American lives it has taken.
The Shia and Sunni extremists are different faces of the same
totalitarian threat. Whatever slogans they chant, when they slaughter
the innocent, they have the same wicked purposes. They want to kill
Americans ... kill democracy in the Middle East ... and gain the weapons
to kill on an even more horrific scale.
In the sixth year since our Nation was attacked, I wish I could report
to you that the dangers have ended. They have not. And so it remains the
policy of this government to use every lawful and proper tool of
intelligence, diplomacy, law enforcement, and military action to do our
duty, to find these enemies, and to protect the American people.
This war is more than a clash of arms — it is a decisive ideological
struggle, and the security of our Nation is in the balance. To prevail,
we must remove the conditions that inspire blind hatred, and drove 19
men to get onto airplanes and come to kill us. What every terrorist
fears most is human freedom — societies where men and women make their
own choices, answer to their own conscience, and live by their hopes
instead of their resentments. Free people are not drawn to violent and
malignant ideologies — and most will choose a better way when they are
given a chance. So we advance our own security interests by helping
moderates, reformers, and brave voices for democracy. The great question
of our day is whether America will help men and women in the Middle East
to build free societies and share in the rights of all humanity. And I
say, for the sake of our own security . . . we must.
In the last two years, we have seen the desire for liberty in the
broader Middle East — and we have been sobered by the enemy’s fierce
reaction. In 2005, the world watched as the citizens of Lebanon raised
the banner of the Cedar Revolution ... drove out the Syrian occupiers
... and chose new leaders in free elections. In 2005, the people of
Afghanistan defied the terrorists and elected a democratic legislature.
And in 2005, the Iraqi people held three national elections — choosing a
transitional government ... adopting the most progressive, democratic
constitution in the Arab world ... and then electing a government under
that constitution. Despite endless threats from the killers in their
midst, nearly 12 million Iraqi citizens came out to vote in a show of
hope and solidarity we should never forget.
A thinking enemy watched all of these scenes, adjusted their tactics,
and in 2006 they struck back. In Lebanon, assassins took the life of
Pierre Gemayel, a prominent participant in the Cedar Revolution. And
Hezbollah terrorists, with support from Syria and Iran, sowed conflict
in the region and are seeking to undermine Lebanon’s legitimately
elected government. In Afghanistan, Taliban and al Qaeda fighters tried
to regain power by regrouping and engaging Afghan and NATO forces. In
Iraq, al Qaeda and other Sunni extremists blew up one of the most sacred
places in Shia Islam — the Golden Mosque of Samarra. This atrocity,
directed at a Muslim house of prayer, was designed to provoke
retaliation from Iraqi Shia — and it succeeded. Radical Shia elements,
some of whom receive support from Iran, formed death squads. The result
was a tragic escalation of sectarian rage and reprisal that continues to
this day.
This is not the fight we entered in Iraq, but it is the fight we are in.
Every one of us wishes that this war were over and won. Yet it would not
be like us to leave our promises unkept, our friends abandoned, and our
own security at risk. Ladies and gentlemen: On this day, at this hour,
it is still within our power to shape the outcome of this battle. So let
us find our resolve, and turn events toward victory.
We are carrying out a new strategy in Iraq — a plan that demands more
from Iraq’s elected government, and gives our forces in Iraq the
reinforcements they need to complete their mission. Our goal is a
democratic Iraq that upholds the rule of law, respects the rights of its
people, provides them security, and is an ally in the war on terror.
In order to make progress toward this goal, the Iraqi government must
stop the sectarian violence in its capital. But the Iraqis are not yet
ready to do this on their own. So we are deploying reinforcements of
more than 20,000 additional soldiers and Marines to Iraq. The vast
majority will go to Baghdad, where they will help Iraqi forces to clear
and secure neighborhoods, and serve as advisers embedded in Iraqi Army
units. With Iraqis in the lead, our forces will help secure the city by
chasing down terrorists, insurgents, and roaming death squads. And in
Anbar province — where al Qaeda terrorists have gathered and local
forces have begun showing a willingness to fight them — we are sending
an additional 4,000 United States Marines, with orders to find the
terrorists and clear them out. We did not drive al Qaeda out of their
safe haven in Afghanistan only to let them set up a new safe haven in a
free Iraq.
The people of Iraq want to live in peace, and now is the time for their
government to act. Iraq’s leaders know that our commitment is not open
ended. They have promised to deploy more of their own troops to secure
Baghdad — and they must do so. They have pledged that they will confront
violent radicals of any faction or political party. They need to follow
through, and lift needless restrictions on Iraqi and Coalition forces,
so these troops can achieve their mission of bringing security to all of
the people of Baghdad. Iraq’s leaders have committed themselves to a
series of benchmarks to achieve reconciliation — to share oil revenues
among all of Iraq’s citizens ... to put the wealth of Iraq into the
rebuilding of Iraq ... to allow more Iraqis to re-enter their nation’s
civic life ... to hold local elections ... and to take responsibility
for security in every Iraqi province. But for all of this to happen,
Baghdad must be secured. And our plan will help the Iraqi government
take back its capital and make good on its commitments.
My fellow citizens, our military commanders and I have carefully weighed
the options. We discussed every possible approach. In the end, I chose
this course of action because it provides the best chance of success.
Many in this chamber understand that America must not fail in Iraq —
because you understand that the consequences of failure would be
grievous and far reaching.
If American forces step back before Baghdad is secure, the Iraqi
government would be overrun by extremists on all sides. We could expect
an epic battle between Shia extremists backed by Iran, and Sunni
extremists aided by al Qaeda and supporters of the old regime. A
contagion of violence could spill out across the country — and in time
the entire region could be drawn into the conflict.
For America, this is a nightmare scenario. For the enemy, this is the
objective. Chaos is their greatest ally in this struggle. And out of
chaos in Iraq, would emerge an emboldened enemy with new safe havens...
new recruits ... new resources ... and an even greater determination to
harm America. To allow this to happen would be to ignore the lessons of
September 11th and invite tragedy. And ladies and gentlemen, nothing is
more important at this moment in our history than for America to succeed
in the Middle East ... to succeed in Iraq ... and to spare the American
people from this danger.
This is where matters stand tonight, in the here and now. I have spoken
with many of you in person. I respect you and the arguments you have
made. We went into this largely united — in our assumptions, and in our
convictions. And whatever you voted for, you did not vote for failure.
Our country is pursuing a new strategy in Iraq — and I ask you to give
it a chance to work. And I ask you to support our troops in the field —
and those on their way.
The war on terror we fight today is a generational struggle that will
continue long after you and I have turned our duties over to others.
That is why it is important to work together so our Nation can see this
great effort through. Both parties and both branches should work in
close consultation. And this is why I propose to establish a special
advisory council on the war on terror, made up of leaders in Congress
from both political parties. We will share ideas for how to position
America to meet every challenge that confronts us. And we will show our
enemies abroad that we are united in the goal of victory.
One of the first steps we can take together is to add to the ranks of
our military — so that the American Armed Forces are ready for all the
challenges ahead. Tonight I ask the Congress to authorize an increase in
the size of our active Army and Marine Corps by 92,000 in the next five
years. A second task we can take on together is to design and establish
a volunteer Civilian Reserve Corps. Such a corps would function much
like our military reserve. It would ease the burden on the Armed Forces
by allowing us to hire civilians with critical skills to serve on
missions abroad when America needs them. And it would give people across
America who do not wear the uniform a chance to serve in the defining
struggle of our time.
Americans can have confidence in the outcome of this struggle — because
we are not in this struggle alone. We have a diplomatic strategy that is
rallying the world to join in the fight against extremism. In Iraq,
multinational forces are operating under a mandate from the United
Nations — and we are working with Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and the
Gulf States to increase support for Iraq’s government. The United
Nations has imposed sanctions on Iran, and made it clear that the world
will not allow the regime in Tehran to acquire nuclear weapons. With the
other members of the Quartet — the UN, the European Union, and Russia —
we are pursuing diplomacy to help bring peace to the Holy Land, and
pursuing the establishment of a democratic Palestinian state living
side-by-side with Israel in peace and security. In Afghanistan, NATO has
taken the lead in turning back the Taliban and al Qaeda offensive — the
first time the Alliance has deployed forces outside the North Atlantic
area. Together with our partners in China, Japan, Russia, and South
Korea, we are pursuing intensive diplomacy to achieve a Korean Peninsula
free of nuclear weapons. And we will continue to speak out for the cause
of freedom in places like Cuba, Belarus, and Burma — and continue to
awaken the conscience of the world to save the people of Darfur.
American foreign policy is more than a matter of war and diplomacy. Our
work in the world is also based on a timeless truth: To whom much is
given, much is required. We hear the call to take on the challenges of
hunger, poverty, and disease — and that is precisely what America is
doing. We must continue to fight HIV/AIDS, especially on the continent
of Africa — and because you funded our Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief,
the number of people receiving life-saving drugs has grown from 50,000
to more than 800,000 in three short years. I ask you to continue funding
our efforts to fight HIV/AIDS. I ask you to provide $1.2 billion over
five years so we can combat malaria in 15 African countries. I ask that
you fund the Millennium Challenge Account, so that American aid reaches
the people who need it, in nations where democracy is on the rise and
corruption is in retreat. And let us continue to support the expanded
trade and debt relief that are the best hope for lifting lives and
eliminating poverty.
When America serves others in this way, we show the strength and
generosity of our country. These deeds reflect the character of our
people. The greatest strength we have is the heroic kindness, courage,
and self sacrifice of the American people. You see this spirit often if
you know where to look — and tonight we need only look above to the
gallery.
Dikembe Mutombo grew up in Africa, amid great poverty and disease. He
came to Georgetown University on a scholarship to study medicine — but
Coach John Thompson got a look at Dikembe and had a different idea.
Dikembe became a star in the NBA, and a citizen of the United States.
But he never forgot the land of his birth — or the duty to share his
blessings with others. He has built a brand new hospital in his
hometown. A friend has said of this good hearted man: “Mutombo believes
that God has given him this opportunity to do great things.” And we are
proud to call this son of the Congo our fellow American.
After her daughter was born, Julie Aigner-Clark searched for ways to
share her love of music and art with her child. So she borrowed some
equipment, and began filming children’s videos in her basement. The Baby
Einstein Company was born — and in just five years her business grew to
more than $20 million in sales. In November 2001, Julie sold Baby
Einstein to the Walt Disney Company, and with her help Baby Einstein has
grown into a $200 million business. Julie represents the great
enterprising spirit of America. And she is using her success to help
others — producing child safety videos with John Walsh of the National
Center for Missing and Exploited Children. Julie says of her new
project: “I believe it’s the most important thing that I’ve ever done. I
believe that children have the right to live in a world that is safe.”
We are pleased to welcome this talented business entrepreneur and
generous social entrepreneur — Julie Aigner-Clark.
Three weeks ago, Wesley Autrey was waiting at a Harlem subway station
with his two little girls, when he saw a man fall into the path of a
train. With seconds to act, Wesley jumped onto the tracks ... pulled the
man into a space between the rails ... and held him as the train passed
right above their heads. He insists he’s not a hero. Wesley says: “We
got guys and girls overseas dying for us to have our freedoms. We got to
show each other some love.” There is something wonderful about a country
that produces a brave and humble man like Wesley Autrey.
Tommy Rieman was a teenager pumping gas in Independence, Kentucky, when
he enlisted in the United States Army. In December 2003, he was on a
reconnaissance mission in Iraq when his team came under heavy enemy
fire. From his Humvee, Sergeant Rieman returned fire — and used his body
as a shield to protect his gunner. He was shot in the chest and arm, and
received shrapnel wounds to his legs — yet he refused medical attention,
and stayed in the fight. He helped to repel a second attack, firing
grenades at the enemy’s position. For his exceptional courage, Sergeant
Rieman was awarded the Silver Star. And like so many other Americans who
have volunteered to defend us, he has earned the respect and gratitude
of our whole country.
In such courage and compassion, ladies and gentlemen, we see the spirit
and character of America — and these qualities are not in short supply.
This is a decent and honorable country — and resilient, too. We have
been through a lot together. We have met challenges and faced dangers,
and we know that more lie ahead. Yet we can go forward with confidence —
because the State of our Union is strong ... our cause in the world is
right ... and tonight that cause goes on.
---------------
The Democratic response was given by Sen.
Jim Webb (D-VA).
Webb is a veteran as was his father.
His son is in the service.
Was there one mention of veterans'
issues? No!
After listening to Webb's disastrously
ineffectual address, three things are clear: Webb needs to take public
speaking lessons; Webb needs to get a new speech writer; and Webb needs
to remember his veteran roots. (NOTE: Webb stands publicly
opposed to the "Attorneys for Veterans" legislation.)
Democratic response here...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/
wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/23/
AR2007012301255.html
Response below:
---------------
Democratic Response to State of Union
By The Associated Press
-- Democratic response of Sen. Jim Webb, D-Va., to President Bush's
State of the Union address Tuesday, as prepared for delivery and
provided by his office:
Good evening.
I'm Sen. Jim Webb, from Virginia, where this year we will celebrate the
400th anniversary of the settlement of Jamestown _ an event that marked
the first step in the long journey that has made us the greatest and
most prosperous nation on earth.
It would not be possible in this short amount of time to actually rebut
the president's message, nor would it be useful. Let me simply say that
we in the Democratic Party hope that this administration is serious
about improving education and health care for all Americans, and
addressing such domestic priorities as restoring the vitality of New
Orleans.
Further, this is the seventh time the president has mentioned energy
independence in his State of the Union message, but for the first time
this exchange is taking place in a Congress led by the Democratic Party.
We are looking for affirmative solutions that will strengthen our nation
by freeing us from our dependence on foreign oil, and spurring a wave of
entrepreneurial growth in the form of alternate energy programs. We look
forward to working with the president and his party to bring about these
changes.
There are two areas where our respective parties have largely stood in
contradiction, and I want to take a few minutes to address them tonight.
The first relates to how we see the health of our economy _ how we
measure it, and how we ensure that its benefits are properly shared
among all Americans. The second regards our foreign policy _ how we
might bring the war in Iraq to a proper conclusion that will also allow
us to continue to fight the war against international terrorism, and to
address other strategic concerns that our country faces around the
world.
When one looks at the health of our economy, it's almost as if we are
living in two different countries. Some say that things have never been
better. The stock market is at an all-time high, and so are corporate
profits. But these benefits are not being fairly shared. When I
graduated from college, the average corporate CEO made 20 times what the
average worker did; today, it's nearly 400 times. In other words, it
takes the average worker more than a year to make the money that his or
her boss makes in one day.
Wages and salaries for our workers are at all-time lows as a percentage
of national wealth, even though the productivity of American workers is
the highest in the world. Medical costs have skyrocketed. College
tuition rates are off the charts. Our manufacturing base is being
dismantled and sent overseas. Good American jobs are being sent along
with them.
In short, the middle class of this country, our historic backbone and
our best hope for a strong society in the future, is losing its place at
the table. Our workers know this, through painful experience. Our
white-collar professionals are beginning to understand it, as their jobs
start disappearing also. And they expect, rightly, that in this age of
globalization, their government has a duty to insist that their concerns
be dealt with fairly in the international marketplace.
In the early days of our republic, President Andrew Jackson established
an important principle of American-style democracy _ that we should
measure the health of our society not at its apex, but at its base. Not
with the numbers that come out of Wall Street, but with the living
conditions that exist on Main Street. We must recapture that spirit
today.
And under the leadership of the new Democratic Congress, we are on our
way to doing so. The House just passed a minimum wage increase, the
first in 10 years, and the Senate will soon follow. We've introduced a
broad legislative package designed to regain the trust of the American
people. We've established a tone of cooperation and consensus that
extends beyond party lines. We're working to get the right things done,
for the right people and for the right reasons.
With respect to foreign policy, this country has patiently endured a
mismanaged war for nearly four years. Many, including myself, warned
even before the war began that it was unnecessary, that it would take
our energy and attention away from the larger war against terrorism, and
that invading and occupying Iraq would leave us strategically vulnerable
in the most violent and turbulent corner of the world.
I want to share with all of you a picture that I have carried with me
for more than 50 years. This is my father, when he was a young Air Force
captain, flying cargo planes during the Berlin Airlift. He sent us the
picture from Germany, as we waited for him, back here at home. When I
was a small boy, I used to take the picture to bed with me every night,
because for more than three years my father was deployed, unable to live
with us full-time, serving overseas or in bases where there was no
family housing. I still keep it, to remind me of the sacrifices that my
mother and others had to make, over and over again, as my father gladly
served our country. I was proud to follow in his footsteps, serving as a
Marine in Vietnam. My brother did as well, serving as a Marine
helicopter pilot. My son has joined the tradition, now serving as an
infantry Marine in Iraq.
Like so many other Americans, today and throughout our history, we serve
and have served, not for political reasons, but because we love our
country. On the political issues _ those matters of war and peace, and
in some cases of life and death _ we trusted the judgment of our
national leaders. We hoped that they would be right, that they would
measure with accuracy the value of our lives against the enormity of the
national interest that might call upon us to go into harm's way.
We owed them our loyalty, as Americans, and we gave it. But they owed us
_ sound judgment, clear thinking, concern for our welfare, a guarantee
that the threat to our country was equal to the price we might be called
upon to pay in defending it.
The president took us into this war recklessly. He disregarded warnings
from the national security adviser during the first Gulf War, the chief
of staff of the Army, two former commanding generals of the Central
Command, whose jurisdiction includes Iraq, the director of operations on
the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and many, many others with great integrity
and long experience in national security affairs. We are now, as a
nation, held hostage to the predictable _ and predicted _ disarray that
has followed.
The war's costs to our nation have been staggering.
Financially.
The damage to our reputation around the world.
The lost opportunities to defeat the forces of international terrorism.
And especially the precious blood of our citizens who have stepped
forward to serve.
The majority of the nation no longer supports the way this war is being
fought; nor does the majority of our military. We need a new direction.
Not one step back from the war against international terrorism. Not a
precipitous withdrawal that ignores the possibility of further chaos.
But an immediate shift toward strong regionally based diplomacy, a
policy that takes our soldiers off the streets of Iraq's cities, and a
formula that will in short order allow our combat forces to leave Iraq.
On both of these vital issues, our economy and our national security, it
falls upon those of us in elected office to take action.
Regarding the economic imbalance in our country, I am reminded of the
situation President Theodore Roosevelt faced in the early days of the
20th century. America was then, as now, drifting apart along class
lines. The so-called robber barons were unapologetically raking in a
huge percentage of the national wealth. The dispossessed workers at the
bottom were threatening revolt.
Roosevelt spoke strongly against these divisions. He told his fellow
Republicans that they must set themselves "as resolutely against
improper corporate influence on the one hand as against demagogy and mob
rule on the other." And he did something about it.
As I look at Iraq, I recall the words of former general and soon-to-be
President Dwight Eisenhower during the dark days of the Korean War,
which had fallen into a bloody stalemate. "When comes the end?" asked
the general who had commanded our forces in Europe during World War II.
And as soon as he became president, he brought the Korean War to an end.
These presidents took the right kind of action, for the benefit of the
American people and for the health of our relations around the world.
Tonight we are calling on this president to take similar action, in both
areas. If he does, we will join him. If he does not, we will be showing
him the way.
Thank you for listening. And God bless America.
---------------
Larry Scott
Don't forget to read all of today's VA
News Flashes (click here)
Click here to make VA Watchdog dot Org your homepage