The Nation's #1 Independent Veterans Web Site
                                                   Click here to make VA Watchdog dot Org your homepage


                  VA NEWS FLASH
from Larry Scott at VA Watchdog dot Org -- 01-10-2007 #2
 


 

VA Medical Malpractice Lawyer -  Malpractice Cases for Veterans Against the VA - The Law Offices of W. Robb Graham, L.L.C. - Former Navy Judge Advocate

click for more info


 
 



VA Watchdog Stuff
cups, hats, shirts
click here to
support the site






Be sure to get all four
VA Watchdog dot Org
RSS feeds --
Daily VA
News Flashes
House CVA
Veterans' News

Senate CVA
Veterans' News

VA Press
Releases


 

Printer Friendly Page

VA DRUG PLAN EYED BY COST-CONSCIOUS DEMOCRATIC

CONGRESS -- A Veterans Affairs program may provide a

model to reduce U.S. spending for medicines.

 

 

Story here... http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?
pid=20601103&sid=aisC.RCActMM&refer=us

Story below:

---------------

Veterans Drug Plan Eyed by Cost-Conscious Democrats

By Lisa Rapaport



(Bloomberg) -- A Veterans Affairs program may provide a model to reduce U.S. spending for medicines sold by Pfizer Inc. and other drugmakers, according to Democratic lawmakers.

The VA health-care plan for U.S. military veterans spent an average of $1,000 on medications for each of its 4.3 million patients last year, charging no insurance premiums and $8 for each prescription. Medicare paid $1,358 on average for drugs to treat 22.6 million elderly and disabled Americans, and the average patient spent an additional $1,056.

Democrats say the difference is that the VA is allowed by law to get price discounts directly from companies like Pfizer, the world's largest drugmaker; Merck & Co.; and Eli Lilly & Co. Medicare, barred by law from haggling for price breaks, contracts out its drug coverage to private insurance providers, which then negotiate with companies.

``For the millions of American veterans, we've bargained for the lowest-priced drugs so they get the best medicine at the lowest cost,'' Senator Dick Durbin, an Illinois Democrat, said in an interview. ``The same model has to be used for senior citizens.''

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a California Democrat, scheduled a Jan. 12 vote on negotiated Medicare drug prices. A measure introduced last week by Representative John Dingell, a Michigan Democrat, would require the government to negotiate for lower prices without specifying how. Democrats say the provision may save patients as much as $96 billion over 10 years.

Getting discounts as low as the VA's may require Medicare to limit patient drug choices, according to the designer of the veterans' program. Dingell's proposal specifies that the government wouldn't restrict access to drugs. The different approaches may be critical, said Ken Kizer, former VA undersecretary of health.

Excluding Lipitor

``The VA gets better prices because it has a single, nationwide formulary,'' or restrictive list of covered medicines, Kizer, who started the program a decade ago, said in an interview. ``Pharmaceutical companies are willing to give very good prices to get on this list.''

Kizer is now chairman and chief executive officer of medical information firm Medsphere, in Aliso Viejo, California.

The VA excludes some of the most expensive and profitable treatments. The program won't pay the $3.40-a-day price for Pfizer's cholesterol drug Lipitor, the world's best-selling medicine. Patients are instead prescribed Zocor, a drug sold by Whitehouse Station, New Jersey-based Merck, which costs less than Lipitor.

The cheapest Medicare price for 20 milligram Zocor tablets was $1,485.96 a year, more than 10 times the lowest VA price of $127.44, according to a report released today by Washington- based consumer advocacy group Families USA. Lipitor's lowest price under Medicare plans was 51 percent higher than the VA would pay. The agency can cover the drug if a doctor requests.

58 Percent Savings

VA prices are at least 58 percent lower for half of the top 20 drugs prescribed to seniors than prices charged by the five insurers with the largest enrollments in the Medicare drug plan, Families USA said today.

The drugmakers' trade group, the Washington-based Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, is against applying the VA system to Medicare. In a report last month, the organization said the VA covers just 62 percent of cholesterol treatments while Medicare includes them all. Medicare covered 88 percent of diabetes drugs, while VA included 47 percent, the report stated.

The government's projected cost for the Medicare drug benefit over the first decade, through 2015, is about $729 billion. Drug expenses reached $30.7 billion last year, according to Medicare.

Savings for Patients, Government

Medicare patients could save more than $96 billion over 10 years on premiums, co-payments and other out-of-pocket drug costs if Medicare officials negotiated prices, according to an October report by Representative Henry Waxman, a California Democrat.

Under standard Medicare drug plans, patients buy their drugs through conventional or mail-order pharmacies. They pay the first $250 in costs, and then the government covers 75 percent until medicine purchases total $2,250. Patients pay the next $5,100 out of their own pockets, and the government covers 95 percent of any additional drug expenses.

Some Democrats argue that by getting lower prices, Medicare could eliminate the coverage gap, known as the ``donut hole.'' The provision was written into the 2003 law to limit the government's outlays for drugs. In 2006, 1.8 million people, or 8 percent of those in the program, incurred costs because of the provision, according to Medicare.

Obama's Hope

``My hope is that we generate enough savings that will help fill the donut hole,'' Senator Barack Obama, an Illinois Democrat, said in an interview.

Medicare can't copy the VA system of operating its own medical dispensaries, a key to its lower costs, said Jack Cox, a spokesman for New York-based Pfizer, in an e-mail exchange.

``Scaling up the VA model for Medicare is a politically convenient argument, but in practical terms, would never work for America's seniors,'' Cox said.

The Congressional Budget Office and independent Medicare actuaries have concluded that government price negotiation is unlikely to lead to lower costs than what private health insurance companies get, Medicare spokesman Jeff Nelligan said.

Passing legislation requiring government price negotiations may be easier than putting it into effect, former Medicare chief Mark McClellan said at a conference yesterday in San Francisco. The Dingell proposal would bar the government from creating a preferred drug list.

``The House bill has a paradox,'' McClellan said. ``The specifics can cause problems with patient access.''



To contact the reporter on this story: Lisa Rapaport in New York at Lrapaport1@bloomberg.net

---------------

Larry Scott

Click here to make VA Watchdog dot Org your homepage

email Larry  PGP key on request

Send this page to a friend:    

(go back to VA Watchdog dot Org Home Page)


 

Honoring Victims of Agent Orange Illnesses & Deaths with Gratis Medal - Vietnam Veterans get a Yearly Full Physical - Your Life May Be Saved

The Order of the Silver Rose

click for more info

 

If you're military, you need to know VA Joe. Active military forum and comedy contests along with updates on VA benefits through the GI Bill program, all from Joe -- Sign up today.

 



VA Watchdog Stuff
cups, hats, shirts
click here to
support the site








Be sure to get all four
VA Watchdog dot Org
RSS feeds --
Daily VA
News Flashes
House CVA
Veterans' News

Senate CVA
Veterans' News

VA Press
Releases




 

   
Google
 
Web www.vawatchdog.org


FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such materials available in an effort to advance understanding of veterans' issues. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed an interest in receiving the included information for educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml   If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.