Printer Friendly Page
THE FISCAL YEAR 2008 VA BUDGET -- Who's saying
what
and a closer look at the numbers.

The 2008 budget proposal is out from the
White House.
There are not many happy campers.
Let's take a closer look at the VA
portion of this budget.
First, here is a link to the 2008 VA
budget...
http://www.va.gov/budget/summary/index.htm
Every year, the Independent Budget VSOs
put out their idea of the VA budget. You can find their budget
here...
http://es3.pva.org/independentbudget/index.htm
Now that you've read all of that :-) ,
here's what people are saying.
First is a news article...then reaction
from both sides of the House and Senate Vets' Committees. You can
pick your favorite. As you will see, their is a partisan divide
here...Democrats think the budget is too small...and Republicans think
it's fine.
New story here...
http://washdateline.mgnetwork.com/index.cfm
?SiteID=wsh&PackageID=46&fuseaction
=article.main&ArticleID=9370&GroupID=213
News story below:
---------------
Veterans, Congress say VA budget needs more
money
By JAMES W. CRAWLEY
Media General News Service
WASHINGTON - The good news for veterans is President Bush wants to spend
more next year on veterans than ever before.
The bad news, say veterans groups and many in Congress, is it's not
enough during wartime.
Also, the president is trying to revive proposals that Congress rejected
previously to boost prescription drug costs and to require some veterans
to begin paying enrollment fees for VA medical care.
At $87 billion for fiscal 2008, the Bush budget request for the
Department of Veterans Affairs is the largest in history and 77 percent
higher than 2001. About $45 billion would go to mandatory benefits and
pensions, the rest for healthcare, construction and other programs.
Health care, cemeteries, education benefits and construction would
receive an 8 percent increase in discretionary spending.
VA Secretary James Nicholson called it a "landmark budget" when he
testified before Congress last week. On Tuesday, Nicholson lobbied the
Senate Veterans Affairs Committee on the spending plan.
But any optimism the VA budget would pass muster was quickly dispelled.
Proposals to boost prescription drug co-payments for some veterans from
$8 to $15 for a 30-day supply of medicine and charge medical enrollment
fees, up to $750 annually, for wealthier veterans without
service-connected disabilities met stiff opposition.
"I think it's dead on arrival," declared House Veterans Affairs
Committee Chairman Rep. Bob Filner, D-Calif.
While noting that the budget calls for a spending increase for medical
care, Filner said, "I strongly believe that more resources are needed to
properly fund the VA."
He and veterans groups want more money for mental health services,
assistance to military personnel leaving the armed forces and research.
"It's a really good step in the right direction, but there are some
shortfalls," said Dennis Cullinan, Veterans of Foreign Wars' legislative
director. "It continues to fall behind veterans' needs."
Four veterans organizations -- the VFW, AMVETS, Disabled American
Veterans and the Paralyzed Veterans of America -- produce an annual
"Independent Budget" for the VA.
As in past years, the organizations' substitute budget is higher than
the White House version -- for 2008 by $3.7 billion.
Under that plan, health care would get an extra $2 billion and another
billion dollars would go for new hospitals and clinics. Cemeteries,
benefits processing and other accounts also would be boosted.
With an aging veteran population from the Vietnam War, along with new
veterans from Iraq and Afghanistan, the VA has seen a ballooning backlog
in benefits claims. Last year, the VA received more than 806,000 claims.
The Bush budget seeks to add 457 more claims personnel in hopes of
lowering the average processing time from 177 days to 145.
House VA committee member Rep. Gus Bilirakis, R-Fla., said, "They are
addressing the (claims) backlog."
"It may not be enough, but it's a start," he said.
James W. Crawley is a national correspondent in Media General's
Washington Bureau. E-mail Crawley at
jcrawley@mediageneral.com
---------------
Rep. Bob Filner (D-CA), Chairman of the
House Committee on Veterans' Affairs, doesn't like it.
Filner's comments here...
http://www.vawatchdog.org/07/hcva07/hcva021507-2.htm
Comments below:
---------------
DEMOCRATIC
PRESS RELEASE
February 15, 2007
Contact: Kristal DeKleer
202/225-9756
Statement from the Chairman of the
House Veterans' Affairs Committee Bob Filner (D-CA) regarding the
President's proposed budget for FY 2008:
"We have inherited many years of
neglect in funding the needs of our country's veterans. The magnitude
cannot be corrected overnight but we must begin to address the serious
shortfalls that exist.
"We have
recommended to the House Committee on Budget
that improving health care for veterans must be a priority.
We must fully fund the health care needs.
Mental health and post-traumatic stress disorders are
serious problems facing our returning service members and
are an ongoing issue facing
veterans from our previous conflicts. I reject the fees proposed by the
Administration, which are nothing more than a tax on
our veterans.
"If we can pay for the war, we
must be prepared to pay for the warriors. Caring for our veterans is a
cost of war and a continuing cost of our national defense."
---------------
Rep. Steve Buyer (R-IN), Ranking Minority
Member on the House Vets' Committee, thinks it's a strong budget.
Buyer's comments here...
http://www.vawatchdog.org/07/hcva07/hcva020807-1.htm
Comments below:
---------------
REPUBLICAN PRESS RELEASE
Thursday, February 8, 2007
Buyer says strong veterans’ budget reflects VA secretary’s leadership
Washington D.C. — Praising the Secretary of Veterans Affairs (VA) for
his leadership in getting America’s veterans a strong fiscal year 2008
budget proposal, House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs Ranking Member
Steve Buyer (R-Ind.), heard testimony today from VA and veterans groups
on the president’s annual budget request. The $86.75 billion budget,
which drew acclaim but also some concern, is an increase of about 8
percent over the request for FY 2007, the largest amount ever requested
by VA.
“I commend you for yet again embracing the challenge of improving VA’s
budgeting process,” Buyer said. “Building on last year’s progress,
improving the integrity of the process has borne fruit with this
budget.”
“There are significant changes and challenges facing our veterans as
they return from the war on terror. This budget will allow them to
receive the care they need and lead full lives,” Buyer said, noting that
much of the federal government received a 2.2 percent increase in the
president’s request, due to the need to reduce the national debt.
Buyer commended Nicholson’s decision to embrace the idea of centralizing
its information technology under VA’s chief information officer. “This
innovation will be seen as part of your legacy to the Department of
Veterans Affairs.”
The committee also heard testimony from representatives of the
Independent Budget, the American Legion and Vietnam Veterans of America,
although in contrast to proceedings last year, the majority of veterans
groups will not be permitted to testify until after the budget has been
developed.
“This input is important, but these groups here do not represent all
veterans. We’ll get other input later, when veterans are in town for
their conventions, but that will be after the budget is done,” Buyer
said, expressing disappointment that in calling for “joint” hearings in
the spring, some veterans’ service organizations (VSOs) have chosen
“theater” over substance. “I set up a process to let veterans into the
budget process and now they are being relegated to the back bench,
silenced.”
Buyer, noting that no military service organizations (MSOs) have been
asked to share their budgetary views, has asked Committee Chairman Bob
Filner (D-Calif.) to convene a meeting of VSOs and MSOs to hear their
views before the budget is written.
The administration’s budget request includes $36.6 billion for veterans’
medical care, including $740 million for medical facilities
construction. These facilities will include new hospitals – some
authorized last year – in Las Vegas, Nev., Denver, Colo., and Orlando,
Fla., a spinal cord injury center for Syracuse, N.Y., and an outpatient
clinic in Lee County, Fla. This year’s major and minor medical
construction request is more than a 60 percent increase over the FY 2007
request.
“The building of these facilities is long overdue and I am pleased to
see that the funding for these projects is included in this request,”
Buyer said.
The budget also includes record funding of $44.7 billion for the
veterans benefit administration. The funds will in part hire an
additional 457 claims adjudicators. Buyer expects VA to explore
innovative ways to reduce an unacceptably large backlog of claims beyond
hiring more compensation and pension claims employees, which require two
to three years of training.
“Simply throwing money at the problem is not the answer,” Buyer said.
“Every one of these claims is not just a number but a veteran and their
family who deserve the compensation that is owed to them. I am troubled
by what I would characterize as an insufficient use of technology, and
instead, the status quo – throwing more people at the problem.”
Discussing the Montgomery GI Bill for veterans returning from Operation
Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom with VSO leaders, Buyer
reviewed accomplishments made during the last Congress.
“You asked for improvements to the GI Bill,” Buyer said. “In the last
Congress we made [GI Bill] chapter 35 more flexible for spouses and
dependents, we restored the entitlements for National Guard and Reserve
called to active duty during the school year, we extended work study
provisions to ensure a vet didn’t lose a job during the school year, and
we required VA to report ways to streamline administration of the GI
Bill to shorten the time to get that first check.”
Buyer praised VA’s agreement with the U.S. Olympic Committee that
permits participants in VA’s National Wheelchair Games and National
Disabled Veterans Winter Sports Clinic to qualify for the U.S.
Paralympics.
“You are tapping into hope,” Buyer said to Nicholson. “You are giving
great hope to a lot of veterans, helping them aspire to levels in those
sports they never dreamed would be possible.”
Buyer concluded, saying, “There is more to be done to ensure access to
quality care and prompt delivery of benefits to all who have earned
them, and I look forward to working with other members of the committee
on these issues.”
---------------
Sen. Daniel Akaka (D-HI), Chairman of the
Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs, doesn't like this VA budget.
Akaka's comments here...
http://www.vawatchdog.org/07/scva07/scva020607-1.htm
Comments below:
---------------
DEMOCRATIC PRESS RELEASE
Tuesday, February 6, 2007
AKAKA DISAPPOINTED WITH PRESIDENT’S BUDGET
WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senator Daniel K. Akaka expressed serious
concern about the Budget for Fiscal Year 2008, proposed today by
President George W. Bush. Akaka said the budget shortchanges veterans,
retirees, students, middle class families and the environment.
“While these spending cuts are supposedly there to fight the huge
deficit built during the first six years of this Bush administration, in
reality this new budget does little to rein-in the uncontrolled spending
that is threatening our nation’s security,” Akaka said. Many of the
perceived savings in the budget amount to nothing more than creative
accounting, Akaka noted, and the budget still fails to account for the
full costs of the war in Iraq.
Hawaii’s 117,000 Veterans Could Be Hurt By VA Funding Shortfalls:
The budget requests approximately $34.2 billion for veterans health
care, a mere 6 percent increase over the 2007 funding level of $32.3
billion in the Joint Funding Resolution expected to pass the Senate.
Once inflationary costs are subtracted from the Administration’s budget,
the real increase is far from adequate. This budget will not allow for
any new initiatives, including enhancements to mental health services
desperately needed for our returning servicemembers. Without adequate
funding, the VA health care system will find it more difficult to
provide quality care for Hawaii’s 117,000 veterans and troops returning
from Iraq and Afghanistan.
Senator Akaka said today he’s especially concerned about out-of-pocket
expenses veterans would be forced to pay under the Administration’s new
budget proposal. “The doubling of drug copayments for veterans – who
make as little as $28,000 a year – seems particularly cruel. Take the
example of a veteran living on Oahu, where the cost of living is so
high, who takes seven different prescriptions each month: his out of
pocket cost goes up by $600 a year.
“Why are we asking veterans to suffer in order to finance a war? This
Administration consistently fails to consider the cost of caring for
veterans as part of the cost of war,” Akaka said.
---------------
Sen. Larry Craig (R-ID), Ranking Minority
Member on the Senate Vet's Committee is in love with this budget.
Craig's comments here...
http://www.vawatchdog.org/07/scva07/scva020507-1.htm
Comments below:
---------------
REPUBLICAN PRESS RELEASE
Monday, February 5, 2007
ANOTHER STRONG VA BUDGET GETS SEN. CRAIG’S PRAISE
“This budget sends a clear message to the troops,” Craig says
Media contact: Jeff Schrade (202)224-9093
(Washington, DC) U.S. Senator Larry Craig said today that VA’s 2008
budget is another strong proposal by President Bush to care for our
nation’s veterans. The President’s new funding recommendation requests
$86.7 billion dollars for fiscal year 2008 – an estimated 8 percent
increase over this year’s anticipated budget.
"While I’m anxious to delve deeper into the details behind the request,
it’s clear that this President and this Congress continue to make
veterans a top priority. If we approve this budget, spending on
veterans’ programs will have increased approximately 77 percent since
President Bush took office. Those are stunning spending increases by any
measure," said Craig, the top Republican on the U.S. Senate Committee on
Veterans’ Affairs.
"This budget sends a clear message to the troops that we support them
and we will be here to take care of them when they return."
Among the military services, the President has proposed increasing
spending an average of 11.3 percent – Army would get 20 percent increase
over this year, to $130.1 billion; Air Force would get an 8 percent
increase, to $136.6 billion; Navy's budget would rise by 9 percent, to
$119.3 billion; and the Marine Corps would rise 4.3 percent, to $20.5
billion.
In making the budget announcement, Secretary of Veterans Affairs Jim
Nicholson also announced that he plans to create a special Advisory
Committee composed of veterans from wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. The
panel will also include spouses and parents who will report directly to
the Secretary on issues impacting young veterans and their families.
"The Secretary already spends countless hours with veterans of
Operations Iraqi and Enduring Freedom. I’m pleased to see that he has
decided to formalize a role in VA’s hierarchy for these American
heroes," Craig said.
In addition to providing renewed focus on young veterans, VA experts
project the agency will be able to cut the claims processing time by 18
percent. Furthermore, Secretary Nicholson announced a change in policy
advocated by Senator Craig to give priority treatment to all disability
claims filed by veterans who are returning home from the conflicts in
Iraq and Afghanistan.
"Returning combat veterans are the nation’s number one priority. Delays
and backlogs should not enter into our vocabulary when discussing their
claims for disability compensation," Craig said.
The FY ’08 budget proposal calls for $42 billion in discretionary
funding -- mostly for health care -- which is the largest amount ever
requested by a President for VA. It also would provide $45 billion in
mandatory funding, mostly for compensation, pension, educational
assistance, home loan guaranties and other benefit programs.
---------------
Larry Scott --